Spatial inefficiency of MaxWeight scheduling

P. Ven, S. Borst, Lei Ying
{"title":"Spatial inefficiency of MaxWeight scheduling","authors":"P. Ven, S. Borst, Lei Ying","doi":"10.1109/WIOPT.2011.5930066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MaxWeight scheduling has gained enormous popularity as a powerful paradigm for achieving queue stability and maximum throughput in a wide variety of scenarios. The maximum-stability guarantees however rely on the fundamental premise that the system consists of a fixed set of flows with stationary ergodic traffic processes. In the present paper we examine networks where the population of active flows varies over time, as flows eventually end while new flows occasionally start. We show that MaxWeight policies may fail to provide maximum stability due to persistent inefficient spatial reuse. The intuitive explanation is that these policies tend to serve flows with large backlogs, even when the resulting spatial reuse is not particularly efficient, and fail to exploit maximum spatial reuse patterns involving flows with smaller backlogs. These results indicate that instability of MaxWeight scheduling can occur due to spatial inefficiency in networks with fixed transmission rates, which is fundamentally different from the inability to fully exploit time-varying rates shown in prior work. We discuss how the potential instability effects can be countered by spatial traffic aggregation, and describe some of the associated challenges and performance trade-offs.","PeriodicalId":430755,"journal":{"name":"2011 International Symposium of Modeling and Optimization of Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 International Symposium of Modeling and Optimization of Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WIOPT.2011.5930066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

MaxWeight scheduling has gained enormous popularity as a powerful paradigm for achieving queue stability and maximum throughput in a wide variety of scenarios. The maximum-stability guarantees however rely on the fundamental premise that the system consists of a fixed set of flows with stationary ergodic traffic processes. In the present paper we examine networks where the population of active flows varies over time, as flows eventually end while new flows occasionally start. We show that MaxWeight policies may fail to provide maximum stability due to persistent inefficient spatial reuse. The intuitive explanation is that these policies tend to serve flows with large backlogs, even when the resulting spatial reuse is not particularly efficient, and fail to exploit maximum spatial reuse patterns involving flows with smaller backlogs. These results indicate that instability of MaxWeight scheduling can occur due to spatial inefficiency in networks with fixed transmission rates, which is fundamentally different from the inability to fully exploit time-varying rates shown in prior work. We discuss how the potential instability effects can be countered by spatial traffic aggregation, and describe some of the associated challenges and performance trade-offs.
MaxWeight调度的空间低效性
MaxWeight调度作为在各种场景中实现队列稳定性和最大吞吐量的强大范例,已经获得了极大的普及。然而,最大稳定性保证依赖于一个基本前提,即系统由一组固定的流组成,这些流具有固定的遍历交通过程。在本文中,我们研究了活跃流动人口随时间变化的网络,因为流动最终会结束,而新流动偶尔会开始。我们展示了MaxWeight策略可能由于持续低效的空间重用而无法提供最大的稳定性。直观的解释是,这些策略倾向于为具有大量积压的流服务,即使结果的空间重用不是特别有效,并且无法利用涉及具有较小积压的流的最大空间重用模式。这些结果表明,在固定传输速率的网络中,MaxWeight调度的不稳定性可能是由于空间效率低下造成的,这与之前研究中无法充分利用时变速率的问题有着根本的不同。我们讨论了如何通过空间交通聚合来抵消潜在的不稳定性影响,并描述了一些相关的挑战和性能权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信