Education and Academic Communication: Functions and Intersections

Ivan Cvetanović
{"title":"Education and Academic Communication: Functions and Intersections","authors":"Ivan Cvetanović","doi":"10.55206/fket4524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The crisis in education has been the problem for many decades and entropy in education does exist. The aim is to present a situation in Serbia concerning education and reforms as well as to highlight a new strategy in the process of education. The hypothesis is that entropy could be replaced by synergy and academic honesty could be integrated in the legal system in the domain of education in Serbia. The focus is on several topics: Good practices of scholars from the USA in the field of shared responsibility for student learning as a creative approach to reforms in education are presented. A few examples of negative appearances in the structure and organization in educational institutions in Serbia are analysed too. Some perspectives are described. The first one is related to unity, responsibility, and trust between all parties responsible for the successful education: teachers, students, and parents, local and state representatives. The second one is that without democratic media and objective and true information about the real situation in the domain of education, all efforts toward achieving progress will remain locked in the paper work and empty promises of a bureaucratic way of thinking in the field of education. Кеywords: education, entropy, synergy, academic honesty, knowledge society, media.","PeriodicalId":215869,"journal":{"name":"Rhetoric and Communications","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhetoric and Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55206/fket4524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The crisis in education has been the problem for many decades and entropy in education does exist. The aim is to present a situation in Serbia concerning education and reforms as well as to highlight a new strategy in the process of education. The hypothesis is that entropy could be replaced by synergy and academic honesty could be integrated in the legal system in the domain of education in Serbia. The focus is on several topics: Good practices of scholars from the USA in the field of shared responsibility for student learning as a creative approach to reforms in education are presented. A few examples of negative appearances in the structure and organization in educational institutions in Serbia are analysed too. Some perspectives are described. The first one is related to unity, responsibility, and trust between all parties responsible for the successful education: teachers, students, and parents, local and state representatives. The second one is that without democratic media and objective and true information about the real situation in the domain of education, all efforts toward achieving progress will remain locked in the paper work and empty promises of a bureaucratic way of thinking in the field of education. Кеywords: education, entropy, synergy, academic honesty, knowledge society, media.
教育与学术传播:功能与交集
摘要:教育危机问题已经存在了几十年,教育熵确实存在。其目的是介绍塞尔维亚有关教育和改革的情况,并强调教育进程中的一项新战略。假设是,熵可以被协同作用所取代,学术诚信可以融入塞尔维亚教育领域的法律体系。重点讨论了以下几个主题:介绍了美国学者在学生学习责任分担领域的良好实践,并将其作为一种创造性的教育改革方法。文中还分析了塞尔维亚教育机构在结构和组织方面出现消极现象的几个例子。描述了一些观点。第一个是关于团结,责任,以及所有负责成功教育的各方之间的信任:教师,学生,家长,地方和州代表。第二,如果没有民主的媒体和客观真实的信息来反映教育领域的真实情况,所有取得进步的努力都将停留在文书工作和教育领域官僚主义思维方式的空洞承诺中。Кеywords:教育,熵,协同,学术诚信,知识社会,媒体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信