Appropriateness of Covid-19 vaccine and misconceptions among Pakistani population: a web-based national survey

M. Panhwar, P. Memon, Sadaf Shamshad, Zulalikhan Baloch, Wajiha Anzar, Qasier Ali Baig
{"title":"Appropriateness of Covid-19 vaccine and misconceptions among Pakistani population: a web-based national survey","authors":"M. Panhwar, P. Memon, Sadaf Shamshad, Zulalikhan Baloch, Wajiha Anzar, Qasier Ali Baig","doi":"10.32413/pjph.v12i4.1049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Uncertainty about any kind of medication will be a potential threat. Hesitancy regarding vaccination is a danger to overall global public health. Since it’s the first-time global efforts were made to develop a vaccine against the pandemic of COVID-19. So, this is unknown its acceptance in the community. Getting information regarding the key determinants that influence and potential myths about the vaccine might help full to develop strategies that can help improve the vaccination programs globally. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine, its determinants, and myths about the vaccine among people in Pakistan.\nMethods: A descriptive web-based based study was done, using snowball sampling, bilingual, and a self-administered close-ended questionnaire was sent to participants through google forms on social media platforms and email.\nResults: A total of 463 participants from all over Pakistan showed the minimum level of secondary education. The occupational status of the participants showed that (45.1%) were currently employed. Vaccination and their perception can be influenced by educational/socioeconomic statuses, participants were also asked about factors they considered to be the most influential in terms of encouraging and discouraging. Fear of getting an infection was the most encouraging factor (39.1%) for people to get vaccinated, whereas adverse effects via social and digital media were the most demotivating factor (36.5%).  Participants were asked the reasons for their reluctance; most were afraid of an allergic reaction to the vaccine. The various myths and misconceptions associated with the Covid vaccine showed by logistic regression analysis for factors that were potentially associated with the intake of covid vaccination.\nConclusion: Addressing educational/sociodemographic factors relating to the COVID-19 vaccination might help encourage the uptake of the vaccination program globally which also tackles future pandemics.","PeriodicalId":256876,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Public Health","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32413/pjph.v12i4.1049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uncertainty about any kind of medication will be a potential threat. Hesitancy regarding vaccination is a danger to overall global public health. Since it’s the first-time global efforts were made to develop a vaccine against the pandemic of COVID-19. So, this is unknown its acceptance in the community. Getting information regarding the key determinants that influence and potential myths about the vaccine might help full to develop strategies that can help improve the vaccination programs globally. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine, its determinants, and myths about the vaccine among people in Pakistan. Methods: A descriptive web-based based study was done, using snowball sampling, bilingual, and a self-administered close-ended questionnaire was sent to participants through google forms on social media platforms and email. Results: A total of 463 participants from all over Pakistan showed the minimum level of secondary education. The occupational status of the participants showed that (45.1%) were currently employed. Vaccination and their perception can be influenced by educational/socioeconomic statuses, participants were also asked about factors they considered to be the most influential in terms of encouraging and discouraging. Fear of getting an infection was the most encouraging factor (39.1%) for people to get vaccinated, whereas adverse effects via social and digital media were the most demotivating factor (36.5%).  Participants were asked the reasons for their reluctance; most were afraid of an allergic reaction to the vaccine. The various myths and misconceptions associated with the Covid vaccine showed by logistic regression analysis for factors that were potentially associated with the intake of covid vaccination. Conclusion: Addressing educational/sociodemographic factors relating to the COVID-19 vaccination might help encourage the uptake of the vaccination program globally which also tackles future pandemics.
巴基斯坦人口中Covid-19疫苗的适当性和误解:一项基于网络的全国调查
背景:任何一种药物的不确定性都是潜在的威胁。对疫苗接种犹豫不决是对全球公共卫生的一种威胁。由于这是全球首次努力开发针对COVID-19大流行的疫苗。所以,这是未知的,它在社会上的接受程度。获得有关影响疫苗的关键决定因素和潜在误解的信息可能有助于制定有助于改善全球疫苗接种计划的战略。本研究旨在评估巴基斯坦人对COVID-19疫苗的接受程度、决定因素以及对疫苗的误解。方法:基于网络的描述性研究,采用滚雪球抽样,双语,并通过社交媒体平台和电子邮件上的谷歌表格向参与者发送自我管理的封闭式问卷。结果:来自巴基斯坦各地的463名参与者达到了中等教育的最低水平。受访者的职业状况显示,目前有工作的占45.1%。接种疫苗及其看法可能受到教育/社会经济地位的影响,参与者还被问及他们认为在鼓励和阻碍方面影响最大的因素。对感染的恐惧是人们接种疫苗最令人鼓舞的因素(39.1%),而社交和数字媒体的不良影响是最令人沮丧的因素(36.5%)。参与者被问及不情愿的原因;大多数人担心疫苗会产生过敏反应。对可能与Covid疫苗接种相关的因素进行logistic回归分析,揭示了与Covid疫苗接种相关的各种神话和误解。结论:解决与COVID-19疫苗接种相关的教育/社会人口因素可能有助于鼓励全球采用疫苗接种计划,这也有助于应对未来的大流行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信