{"title":"Epistemic Trespassing","authors":"N. Ballantyne","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many controversial questions are properly explored using tools from multiple fields of inquiry. We risk “epistemic trespassing” when we hold controversial views on the basis of evidence and skills drawn from only some of the relevant fields. This chapter contends that once we learn we have trespassed, we should often lower our level of confidence in our controversial opinions.","PeriodicalId":345622,"journal":{"name":"Knowing Our Limits","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"55","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowing Our Limits","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55
Abstract
Many controversial questions are properly explored using tools from multiple fields of inquiry. We risk “epistemic trespassing” when we hold controversial views on the basis of evidence and skills drawn from only some of the relevant fields. This chapter contends that once we learn we have trespassed, we should often lower our level of confidence in our controversial opinions.