THE PROBLEM OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY IN PUBLIC MANAGEMENT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROCESSES

L. Volkova
{"title":"THE PROBLEM OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY IN PUBLIC MANAGEMENT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROCESSES","authors":"L. Volkova","doi":"10.32782/2415-8801/2021-2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the system of criteria for evaluating innovation activity in the system of public management of socio-economic processes. It is offered to use not exact values of this or that characteristic, and their indistinct analogues for the description of processes in social systems.\nIt is determined that new knowledge and innovations determine the pace of scientific and technological progress, the viability of enterprises and the competitiveness of economies. This necessitates the search for strategies to stimulate innovation activity in the field of public administration, focused on the formation of a comprehensive system of motivations, the creation of a modern organizational and economic model of activity, the introduction of monitoring and evaluation technologies. At the same time, there is a lack of a systematic approach to the assessment of innovation activity in the public administration system, which is accompanied by an increase in the risks of innovation and negatively affect the introduction of new technologies. In this regard, the problem of selection and implementation of an effective system for monitoring and rating construction is relevant. Existing in theory and practice approaches to innovation management and assessment of the level of its development do not contain clear, unambiguously interpreted criteria for choosing a strategy, as well as tools and methods to stimulate innovation. In addition, insufficient attention is paid to the organizational aspects of the implementation of innovation strategies. The list of the main characteristics for classification of innovative activity and construction of rating monitoring is resulted. Each of the subsystems is characterized by its fuzzy index. Thus, a combination of indexes describing various aspects of system operation is a universal code that can be used to classify and rank. The principles of analysis of quantitative indicators are also used as a methodological basis in the formation of the methodology for assessing innovation activity. Indicators should be used in the development of further strategies and the introduction of rating technologies to monitor the use of modern management techniques, the use of managerial innovations, digitalization of public administration, etc.","PeriodicalId":395338,"journal":{"name":"Intellect XXІ","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellect XXІ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8801/2021-2.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article considers the system of criteria for evaluating innovation activity in the system of public management of socio-economic processes. It is offered to use not exact values of this or that characteristic, and their indistinct analogues for the description of processes in social systems. It is determined that new knowledge and innovations determine the pace of scientific and technological progress, the viability of enterprises and the competitiveness of economies. This necessitates the search for strategies to stimulate innovation activity in the field of public administration, focused on the formation of a comprehensive system of motivations, the creation of a modern organizational and economic model of activity, the introduction of monitoring and evaluation technologies. At the same time, there is a lack of a systematic approach to the assessment of innovation activity in the public administration system, which is accompanied by an increase in the risks of innovation and negatively affect the introduction of new technologies. In this regard, the problem of selection and implementation of an effective system for monitoring and rating construction is relevant. Existing in theory and practice approaches to innovation management and assessment of the level of its development do not contain clear, unambiguously interpreted criteria for choosing a strategy, as well as tools and methods to stimulate innovation. In addition, insufficient attention is paid to the organizational aspects of the implementation of innovation strategies. The list of the main characteristics for classification of innovative activity and construction of rating monitoring is resulted. Each of the subsystems is characterized by its fuzzy index. Thus, a combination of indexes describing various aspects of system operation is a universal code that can be used to classify and rank. The principles of analysis of quantitative indicators are also used as a methodological basis in the formation of the methodology for assessing innovation activity. Indicators should be used in the development of further strategies and the introduction of rating technologies to monitor the use of modern management techniques, the use of managerial innovations, digitalization of public administration, etc.
对社会经济进程公共管理方面的创新活动进行监测和评价的执行问题
本文考虑了评价社会经济过程公共管理系统中创新活动的标准体系。它提出使用这个或那个特征的不精确值,以及它们模糊的类似物来描述社会系统中的过程。新知识和创新决定了科技进步的速度、企业的生存能力和经济的竞争力。这就需要寻求促进公共行政领域创新活动的战略,其重点是形成一个全面的动机系统,创造一种现代的组织和经济活动模式,采用监测和评价技术。与此同时,对公共行政系统内的创新活动缺乏系统的评价方法,这伴随着创新风险的增加,并对新技术的采用产生不利影响。在这方面,选择和实施有效的监测和评级建设制度的问题是相关的。在理论和实践中,现有的创新管理和评估其发展水平的方法没有包含明确的、明确的解释标准来选择战略,以及刺激创新的工具和方法。此外,对创新战略实施的组织方面重视不够。给出了创新活动分类的主要特征清单和评价监测的构建。每个子系统都用其模糊指标来表征。因此,描述系统运行的各个方面的索引的组合是可用于分类和排名的通用代码。定量指标的分析原则也被用作形成评估创新活动的方法的方法基础。指标应用于制定进一步的战略和采用评级技术,以监测现代管理技术的使用、管理创新的使用、公共行政的数字化等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信