Comparing the Effectiveness of Different Classifiers of Data Mining for Signature Recognition System

M. M. Elssaedi, Omar M. Salih, Aziza Ahmeed
{"title":"Comparing the Effectiveness of Different Classifiers of Data Mining for Signature Recognition System","authors":"M. M. Elssaedi, Omar M. Salih, Aziza Ahmeed","doi":"10.1145/3410352.3410820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Handwritten signatures are commonly used for the signification, authentication, and validation of people's important transactions and documents. However, this security measure could also be a threat at the same time. This study aims to develop a model to detect and recognize a signature. This study also tries to extract, investigate and compare the use of static and dynamic features using Five well-known (5) classifiers such as AutoMLP, Naïve Bayes, Neural Network, Gradient Boosted Trees and Generalized Linear Model. The classifier that shows the most acceptable model is Neural Network which shows an accuracy rate of 92.88%.","PeriodicalId":178037,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering & MIS 2020","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering & MIS 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3410352.3410820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Handwritten signatures are commonly used for the signification, authentication, and validation of people's important transactions and documents. However, this security measure could also be a threat at the same time. This study aims to develop a model to detect and recognize a signature. This study also tries to extract, investigate and compare the use of static and dynamic features using Five well-known (5) classifiers such as AutoMLP, Naïve Bayes, Neural Network, Gradient Boosted Trees and Generalized Linear Model. The classifier that shows the most acceptable model is Neural Network which shows an accuracy rate of 92.88%.
签名识别系统中不同分类器数据挖掘的有效性比较
手写签名通常用于人们重要交易和文件的表示、认证和验证。然而,这种安全措施同时也可能是一种威胁。本研究旨在建立一个检测和识别签名的模型。本研究还尝试使用AutoMLP、Naïve贝叶斯、神经网络、梯度增强树和广义线性模型等五种知名分类器提取、调查和比较静态和动态特征的使用。最能被接受的分类器模型是Neural Network,准确率达到92.88%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信