Institutions and Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis of Developing and Developed Countries based on Institutionalized Social Technologies Index

D. Siddiqui, Q. M. Ahmed
{"title":"Institutions and Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis of Developing and Developed Countries based on Institutionalized Social Technologies Index","authors":"D. Siddiqui, Q. M. Ahmed","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3641570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper used index of institutionalized social technologies (lIST) developed by Siddiqui and Ahmed (2018) as a proxy of institutions quality, to analyse their impact on Economic growth. This index was made up of two sub-indices namely Risk reducing technologies and Anti Rent seeking technologies. The cross sectional analysis covered 141 countries. The values are taken as average of the period of 1990 to 2008. The effectiveness of these indices is tested in growth models along with other variables such as inflation, human capital, savings and trade. It also factors in initial conditions to measure signs of convergence. OLS and GMM based methodologies are employed for estimation. The findings are robust and consistent. Institutional quality is positively associated with economic growth suggesting that institutional reforms such as minimizing corruption, strengthen property rights, improving law and order conditions, and enforcing contracts can leads to economic growth. Moreover, the impact of institutions on growth is more pronounces in high income countries, showing institutions are also crucial for sustenance of growth. Among the two forms of institutions, the risk reducing technologies affect economic growth considerably more than anti-rent seeking technologies. The results also confirm conditional convergence as predicted in the modern theories of growth. Overall, these results suggest that effectiveness of institutional reforms would depend upon how these institutions impact growth.","PeriodicalId":138629,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Price Level; Inflation; Deflation (Topic)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Price Level; Inflation; Deflation (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3641570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper used index of institutionalized social technologies (lIST) developed by Siddiqui and Ahmed (2018) as a proxy of institutions quality, to analyse their impact on Economic growth. This index was made up of two sub-indices namely Risk reducing technologies and Anti Rent seeking technologies. The cross sectional analysis covered 141 countries. The values are taken as average of the period of 1990 to 2008. The effectiveness of these indices is tested in growth models along with other variables such as inflation, human capital, savings and trade. It also factors in initial conditions to measure signs of convergence. OLS and GMM based methodologies are employed for estimation. The findings are robust and consistent. Institutional quality is positively associated with economic growth suggesting that institutional reforms such as minimizing corruption, strengthen property rights, improving law and order conditions, and enforcing contracts can leads to economic growth. Moreover, the impact of institutions on growth is more pronounces in high income countries, showing institutions are also crucial for sustenance of growth. Among the two forms of institutions, the risk reducing technologies affect economic growth considerably more than anti-rent seeking technologies. The results also confirm conditional convergence as predicted in the modern theories of growth. Overall, these results suggest that effectiveness of institutional reforms would depend upon how these institutions impact growth.
制度与经济增长:基于制度化社会技术指数的发展中国家与发达国家比较分析
本文使用Siddiqui和Ahmed(2018)开发的制度化社会技术指数(lIST)作为制度质量的代理,分析其对经济增长的影响。该指数由两个分项指数组成,即降低风险技术和反寻租技术。横断面分析涵盖141个国家。这些数值取1990 - 2008年的平均值。这些指数的有效性与通胀、人力资本、储蓄和贸易等其他变量一起,在增长模型中得到检验。它还考虑了初始条件来衡量收敛的迹象。采用基于OLS和GMM的方法进行估计。研究结果是可靠和一致的。制度质量与经济增长呈正相关,这表明制度改革,如最大限度地减少腐败、加强产权、改善法律和秩序条件以及执行合同,可以促进经济增长。此外,制度对增长的影响在高收入国家更为明显,这表明制度对维持增长也至关重要。在两种制度形式中,降低风险的技术对经济增长的影响明显大于反寻租技术。结果也证实了现代增长理论中所预测的条件收敛。总体而言,这些结果表明,制度改革的有效性将取决于这些制度如何影响增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信