Wind Farm Layout Optimization: A Multi-Stage Approach

Puyi Yang, H. Najafi
{"title":"Wind Farm Layout Optimization: A Multi-Stage Approach","authors":"Puyi Yang, H. Najafi","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-71892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Wind Farm Layout Optimization (WFLO) problem is a complex and non-convex optimization problem. Even though a lot of heuristic algorithms and mathematical programming methods have been tested and discussed, there is not a consensus about which algorithm is the most suitable one to solve the WFLO problems. Every algorithm has its own advantages and disadvantages on solving different problems, thus the multi-stage approaches have been picked up. One multi-stage approach applied in solving WFLO problems is to apply an algorithm in stage 1 to capture a coarse, initial optimized layout and import it to stage 2 as an initial condition for another algorithm for further refinement. This paper compared two types of multi-stage methods: The Heuristic-Gradient-based (H-G) model which consists of a heuristic algorithm in stage 1 and a gradient-based algorithm in stage 2; The Discrete-Continuous (D-C) model which consists of a heuristic algorithm in discrete scheme in stage 1 and an algorithm in continuous scheme in stage 2. Annual Energy Production (AEP) is used as the objective function while the computational time associated with each approach is documented. The results illustrate most of the multistage models can improve the optimization procedure both in terms of AEP and computational time. Overall, it is found that the D-C approach is better than the H-G approach. Particularly, the combination of Greedy+Random Search provides the highest AEP and the combination of Greedy and SLSQP provides the lowest computational time.","PeriodicalId":238134,"journal":{"name":"Volume 8B: Energy","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 8B: Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-71892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Wind Farm Layout Optimization (WFLO) problem is a complex and non-convex optimization problem. Even though a lot of heuristic algorithms and mathematical programming methods have been tested and discussed, there is not a consensus about which algorithm is the most suitable one to solve the WFLO problems. Every algorithm has its own advantages and disadvantages on solving different problems, thus the multi-stage approaches have been picked up. One multi-stage approach applied in solving WFLO problems is to apply an algorithm in stage 1 to capture a coarse, initial optimized layout and import it to stage 2 as an initial condition for another algorithm for further refinement. This paper compared two types of multi-stage methods: The Heuristic-Gradient-based (H-G) model which consists of a heuristic algorithm in stage 1 and a gradient-based algorithm in stage 2; The Discrete-Continuous (D-C) model which consists of a heuristic algorithm in discrete scheme in stage 1 and an algorithm in continuous scheme in stage 2. Annual Energy Production (AEP) is used as the objective function while the computational time associated with each approach is documented. The results illustrate most of the multistage models can improve the optimization procedure both in terms of AEP and computational time. Overall, it is found that the D-C approach is better than the H-G approach. Particularly, the combination of Greedy+Random Search provides the highest AEP and the combination of Greedy and SLSQP provides the lowest computational time.
风电场布局优化:多阶段方法
风电场布局优化问题是一个复杂的非凸优化问题。尽管人们对许多启发式算法和数学规划方法进行了测试和讨论,但对于哪种算法最适合解决WFLO问题,并没有达成共识。每种算法在解决不同的问题时都有自己的优点和缺点,因此采用了多阶段方法。一种用于解决WFLO问题的多阶段方法是,在第一阶段应用一个算法来捕获一个粗糙的初始优化布局,并将其导入第二阶段,作为另一个算法进一步细化的初始条件。本文比较了两种多阶段方法:基于启发式-梯度(H-G)模型,该模型由阶段1的启发式算法和阶段2的基于梯度的算法组成;离散-连续(D-C)模型由第一阶段离散格式的启发式算法和第二阶段连续格式的算法组成。使用年度能源生产(AEP)作为目标函数,同时记录了与每种方法相关的计算时间。结果表明,大多数多级模型在AEP和计算时间方面都能改善优化过程。总体而言,我们发现D-C方法优于H-G方法。特别是,贪心+随机搜索的组合提供了最高的AEP,贪心和SLSQP的组合提供了最低的计算时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信