{"title":"Wind Farm Layout Optimization: A Multi-Stage Approach","authors":"Puyi Yang, H. Najafi","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-71892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Wind Farm Layout Optimization (WFLO) problem is a complex and non-convex optimization problem. Even though a lot of heuristic algorithms and mathematical programming methods have been tested and discussed, there is not a consensus about which algorithm is the most suitable one to solve the WFLO problems. Every algorithm has its own advantages and disadvantages on solving different problems, thus the multi-stage approaches have been picked up. One multi-stage approach applied in solving WFLO problems is to apply an algorithm in stage 1 to capture a coarse, initial optimized layout and import it to stage 2 as an initial condition for another algorithm for further refinement. This paper compared two types of multi-stage methods: The Heuristic-Gradient-based (H-G) model which consists of a heuristic algorithm in stage 1 and a gradient-based algorithm in stage 2; The Discrete-Continuous (D-C) model which consists of a heuristic algorithm in discrete scheme in stage 1 and an algorithm in continuous scheme in stage 2. Annual Energy Production (AEP) is used as the objective function while the computational time associated with each approach is documented. The results illustrate most of the multistage models can improve the optimization procedure both in terms of AEP and computational time. Overall, it is found that the D-C approach is better than the H-G approach. Particularly, the combination of Greedy+Random Search provides the highest AEP and the combination of Greedy and SLSQP provides the lowest computational time.","PeriodicalId":238134,"journal":{"name":"Volume 8B: Energy","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 8B: Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-71892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Wind Farm Layout Optimization (WFLO) problem is a complex and non-convex optimization problem. Even though a lot of heuristic algorithms and mathematical programming methods have been tested and discussed, there is not a consensus about which algorithm is the most suitable one to solve the WFLO problems. Every algorithm has its own advantages and disadvantages on solving different problems, thus the multi-stage approaches have been picked up. One multi-stage approach applied in solving WFLO problems is to apply an algorithm in stage 1 to capture a coarse, initial optimized layout and import it to stage 2 as an initial condition for another algorithm for further refinement. This paper compared two types of multi-stage methods: The Heuristic-Gradient-based (H-G) model which consists of a heuristic algorithm in stage 1 and a gradient-based algorithm in stage 2; The Discrete-Continuous (D-C) model which consists of a heuristic algorithm in discrete scheme in stage 1 and an algorithm in continuous scheme in stage 2. Annual Energy Production (AEP) is used as the objective function while the computational time associated with each approach is documented. The results illustrate most of the multistage models can improve the optimization procedure both in terms of AEP and computational time. Overall, it is found that the D-C approach is better than the H-G approach. Particularly, the combination of Greedy+Random Search provides the highest AEP and the combination of Greedy and SLSQP provides the lowest computational time.