Semantic analysis of space imagery for mapping purposes

S. Karakış, H. Topan, G. Buyuksalih, A. Marangoz, K. Jacobsen
{"title":"Semantic analysis of space imagery for mapping purposes","authors":"S. Karakış, H. Topan, G. Buyuksalih, A. Marangoz, K. Jacobsen","doi":"10.1109/RAST.2005.1512620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the area around Zonguldak several space images with different ground sampling distance (GSD) from 30m down to 62cm are available. The semantic information of Landsat images is too poor for the generation of topographic maps, while QuickBird images do allow a mapping in the scale 1:5000. Not only the GSD is determining the possible map scale, also the spectral and radiometric resolution is important. The imaging conditions, especially the sun elevation with the corresponding length of shadows, do lead to quite different results especially in cities with narrow streets. The possibilities and limitations of mapping with the different space images, partially with the same image type taken in different month, has been analysed.","PeriodicalId":156704,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies, 2005. RAST 2005.","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies, 2005. RAST 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAST.2005.1512620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

From the area around Zonguldak several space images with different ground sampling distance (GSD) from 30m down to 62cm are available. The semantic information of Landsat images is too poor for the generation of topographic maps, while QuickBird images do allow a mapping in the scale 1:5000. Not only the GSD is determining the possible map scale, also the spectral and radiometric resolution is important. The imaging conditions, especially the sun elevation with the corresponding length of shadows, do lead to quite different results especially in cities with narrow streets. The possibilities and limitations of mapping with the different space images, partially with the same image type taken in different month, has been analysed.
测绘用空间图像语义分析
从宗古达附近地区获得了从30m到62cm不等的不同地面采样距离(GSD)的空间图像。Landsat图像的语义信息太贫乏,无法生成地形图,而QuickBird图像确实允许1:5000比例尺的映射。GSD不仅决定了可能的地图比例尺,光谱和辐射分辨率也很重要。在街道狭窄的城市,成像条件,尤其是太阳高度和相应阴影长度,确实会导致截然不同的结果。分析了不同空间影像、部分相同影像类型在不同月份进行制图的可能性和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信