Comparison of the expanded disability status scale and the functional independence measure in patients with multiple sclerosis

Nastasja Čelan, D. Čelan, Breda Jesenšek Papež
{"title":"Comparison of the expanded disability status scale and the functional independence measure in patients with multiple sclerosis","authors":"Nastasja Čelan, D. Čelan, Breda Jesenšek Papež","doi":"10.18690/actabiomed.239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to evaluate scales that are used to follow up on the condition and course of rehabilitation for an objective assessment of patients with multiple sclerosis. The most commonly used scale is the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) for obtaining information on neurological impairments. The main disadvantage of this scale is that it focuses a lot on the ability to walk and is not adequately sensitive for detecting the changes in the patient in time. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is the most commonly used scale in rehabilitation. It evaluates the ability of patients to perform daily activities, for example, feeding and dressing. In the study, we focused on the comparison of EDSS and FIM to ascertain the applicability of FIM in patients with multiple sclerosis.  \nMethods: We performed a cross-sectional study of 38 patients with multiple sclerosis by talking to the patients and reviewing the medical documentation where the EDSS evaluation was conducted. Then, we evaluated the patient using the FIM scale. The data were processed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 25 software and displayed graphically using the Microsoft Excel program.  \nResults: The statistical analysis showed a strong negative correlation between EDSS and FIM (r = -0.731). The motor part of the FIM scale had a strong negative correlation with EDSS (r = -0.732). The cognitive part had a weak negative correlation (r = -0.262). The sex and the duration of the disease did not impact the FIM evaluation significantly. The age had a moderately strong negative correlation (r = -0.396).  \nConclusion: We proposed that FIM was a useful scale for the routine evaluation of patients in the clinical environment.","PeriodicalId":186880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medico-Biotechnica","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medico-Biotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/actabiomed.239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate scales that are used to follow up on the condition and course of rehabilitation for an objective assessment of patients with multiple sclerosis. The most commonly used scale is the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) for obtaining information on neurological impairments. The main disadvantage of this scale is that it focuses a lot on the ability to walk and is not adequately sensitive for detecting the changes in the patient in time. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is the most commonly used scale in rehabilitation. It evaluates the ability of patients to perform daily activities, for example, feeding and dressing. In the study, we focused on the comparison of EDSS and FIM to ascertain the applicability of FIM in patients with multiple sclerosis.  Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of 38 patients with multiple sclerosis by talking to the patients and reviewing the medical documentation where the EDSS evaluation was conducted. Then, we evaluated the patient using the FIM scale. The data were processed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 25 software and displayed graphically using the Microsoft Excel program.  Results: The statistical analysis showed a strong negative correlation between EDSS and FIM (r = -0.731). The motor part of the FIM scale had a strong negative correlation with EDSS (r = -0.732). The cognitive part had a weak negative correlation (r = -0.262). The sex and the duration of the disease did not impact the FIM evaluation significantly. The age had a moderately strong negative correlation (r = -0.396).  Conclusion: We proposed that FIM was a useful scale for the routine evaluation of patients in the clinical environment.
扩展残疾状态量表与功能独立性量表在多发性硬化患者中的比较
目的:本研究旨在评估用于随访病情和康复过程的量表,以客观评估多发性硬化症患者。最常用的量表是扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS),用于获取神经损伤的信息。这种量表的主要缺点是它过于关注行走能力,对于及时检测患者的变化不够敏感。功能独立性量表(FIM)是康复治疗中最常用的量表。它评估病人进行日常活动的能力,例如进食和穿衣。在本研究中,我们重点比较EDSS和FIM,以确定FIM在多发性硬化症患者中的适用性。方法:我们对38例多发性硬化症患者进行了横断面研究,通过与患者交谈并查阅进行EDSS评估的医学文献。然后,我们使用FIM量表对患者进行评估。数据用IBM SPSS Statistics 25软件处理,用Microsoft Excel程序图形化显示。结果:经统计学分析,EDSS与FIM呈显著负相关(r = -0.731)。FIM量表的运动部分与EDSS呈较强的负相关(r = -0.732)。认知部分呈弱负相关(r = -0.262)。性别和病程对FIM评价无显著影响。年龄呈中强负相关(r = -0.396)。结论:FIM是临床环境下对患者进行常规评价的有效量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信