Reducing Uncertainty in Overpressure Prediction in the Norwegian Barents Sea

G. Markham, S. O'Connor, P. Milstead, H. Rasmussen
{"title":"Reducing Uncertainty in Overpressure Prediction in the Norwegian Barents Sea","authors":"G. Markham, S. O'Connor, P. Milstead, H. Rasmussen","doi":"10.3997/2214-4609.201900505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pore pressure prediction in the Barents Sea is challenging for a variety of reasons including a complicated and variable burial history (leading to varying magnitudes and timings of burial, hiatus and uplift from well to well), variation in mudrock lithology and depositional environments. These factors can all create uncertainty when predicting pore pressure. Here are introduced two independent methodologies for present day shale pressure prediction across the Barents Sea, focussing in particular in the Southwestern Barents Sea where high overpressure is often recorded. Independent velocity log based and geological modelling based shale pressure prediction methods are used. Comparison of the two models generally shows good consistency in results, helping to validate the predictions and models and reduce uncertainty. This reinforces the need to integrate multiple techniques in order to reduce uncertainty in what is a challenging area for pore pressure prediction. The results also show that understanding the complex and variable burial history in each well is vital for pore pressure prediction, as this history defines the present day pressures. The models developed have clear implications for design of wells in the Barents Sea, and are also important for understanding reservoir overpressure variation (and potential reservoir fluid flow).","PeriodicalId":295902,"journal":{"name":"Second EAGE Workshop on Pore Pressure Prediction","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Second EAGE Workshop on Pore Pressure Prediction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pore pressure prediction in the Barents Sea is challenging for a variety of reasons including a complicated and variable burial history (leading to varying magnitudes and timings of burial, hiatus and uplift from well to well), variation in mudrock lithology and depositional environments. These factors can all create uncertainty when predicting pore pressure. Here are introduced two independent methodologies for present day shale pressure prediction across the Barents Sea, focussing in particular in the Southwestern Barents Sea where high overpressure is often recorded. Independent velocity log based and geological modelling based shale pressure prediction methods are used. Comparison of the two models generally shows good consistency in results, helping to validate the predictions and models and reduce uncertainty. This reinforces the need to integrate multiple techniques in order to reduce uncertainty in what is a challenging area for pore pressure prediction. The results also show that understanding the complex and variable burial history in each well is vital for pore pressure prediction, as this history defines the present day pressures. The models developed have clear implications for design of wells in the Barents Sea, and are also important for understanding reservoir overpressure variation (and potential reservoir fluid flow).
减少挪威巴伦支海超压预测的不确定性
由于多种原因,包括复杂多变的埋藏历史(导致不同井间埋藏、断陷和隆升的幅度和时间不同)、泥岩岩性和沉积环境的变化,巴伦支海孔隙压力预测具有挑战性。在预测孔隙压力时,这些因素都会产生不确定性。这里介绍了两种独立的方法,用于预测巴伦支海的页岩压力,特别是在巴伦支海的西南部,那里经常记录到高压。采用了基于独立速度测井和基于地质建模的页岩压力预测方法。两种模型的比较结果普遍具有较好的一致性,有助于验证预测和模型,减少不确定性。这就加强了整合多种技术的必要性,以减少孔隙压力预测领域的不确定性。研究结果还表明,了解每口井复杂多变的埋藏历史对孔隙压力预测至关重要,因为这段历史决定了当前的压力。所建立的模型对于巴伦支海油井的设计具有明确的意义,对于了解储层超压变化(以及潜在的储层流体流动)也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信