Evaluation of the Problem-Based Learning Effectiveness in the Course of Physics Curriculum Analysis

D. Kusumaningtyas, E. Nursulistiyo, D. Sulisworo
{"title":"Evaluation of the Problem-Based Learning Effectiveness in the Course of Physics Curriculum Analysis","authors":"D. Kusumaningtyas, E. Nursulistiyo, D. Sulisworo","doi":"10.2991/STEACH-18.2019.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In physics learning in higher education, lecturers see that there is a gap between teaching knowledge and expected competencies. This study aims to evaluate the application of problem-based learning or PBL in the learning process in higher education. PBL implementation is supposed to be a solution to the problems of lecturers who feel that the material taught is not enough time to be delivered in the lecture. This research used an explanatory mixed-method analysis. The participants of this study were students who took the course of analyzing the secondary school physics curriculum. During the lecture, observers monitor the learning process by filling out observation sheets. The questionnaire with the Likert scale was used to determine the level of student acceptance of PBL after attending lectures. Interviews were conducted with lecturers and observers related to the implementation of learning and the results obtained. From the existing data processing, the level of PBL implementation is 89% (Very Good), and students can receive PBL as an appropriate method of 82.4% (Very Good). This result is a supporting reason for the application of PBL in improving student","PeriodicalId":221746,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture and Humanity - \"Interdisciplinary Challenges for Humanity Education in Digital Era\" (STEACH 2018)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture and Humanity - \"Interdisciplinary Challenges for Humanity Education in Digital Era\" (STEACH 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/STEACH-18.2019.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In physics learning in higher education, lecturers see that there is a gap between teaching knowledge and expected competencies. This study aims to evaluate the application of problem-based learning or PBL in the learning process in higher education. PBL implementation is supposed to be a solution to the problems of lecturers who feel that the material taught is not enough time to be delivered in the lecture. This research used an explanatory mixed-method analysis. The participants of this study were students who took the course of analyzing the secondary school physics curriculum. During the lecture, observers monitor the learning process by filling out observation sheets. The questionnaire with the Likert scale was used to determine the level of student acceptance of PBL after attending lectures. Interviews were conducted with lecturers and observers related to the implementation of learning and the results obtained. From the existing data processing, the level of PBL implementation is 89% (Very Good), and students can receive PBL as an appropriate method of 82.4% (Very Good). This result is a supporting reason for the application of PBL in improving student
《物理课程分析》课程中基于问题的学习效果评价
在高等教育的物理学习中,教师们发现教学知识与期望能力之间存在着差距。本研究旨在探讨问题型学习(PBL)在高等教育学习过程中的应用。实施PBL的目的是为了解决讲师认为授课时间不够的问题。本研究采用解释性混合分析方法。本研究以修读中学物理课程分析课程的学生为研究对象。在讲座期间,观察员通过填写观察表来监督学习过程。采用李克特量表调查学生听课后对PBL的接受程度。与讲师和观察员就学习的实施和取得的结果进行了访谈。从现有的数据处理来看,PBL的实施水平为89%(非常好),学生可以接受PBL作为一种合适的方法的比例为82.4%(非常好)。这一结果为PBL在提高学生素质方面的应用提供了支持
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信