Comparison of controlled respiration by the manual technique and with a respirator during general anaesthesia for abdominal operations.

W Rychlewski
{"title":"Comparison of controlled respiration by the manual technique and with a respirator during general anaesthesia for abdominal operations.","authors":"W Rychlewski","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>These studies investigating the difference between controlled respiration performed by manual technique and controlled respiration applied by means of a respirator during general anaesthesia, and assessing the influence of these methods on the immediate post-operative condition of the patient were carried out on 75 patients during abdominal operations. Gasometric tests in arterial blood were performed before premedication, at intervals of 30 min from the beginning of operation, and 10 min. after the removal of the endotracheal tube. Controlled respiration with a respirator is a more favourable method of pulmonary ventilation during general anaesthesia given for a long-lasting surgical operation. The manual technique of controlled respiration leads to respiratory alkalosis. The best results were obtained using a respirator with inspiratory volume of 10 ml/kg and respiratory frequency 10/min., which ensured normocapnia. It was observed that oxygenation of arterial blood was reduced postoperatively in all patients but the value of PaO2 was the lowest in patients on manual controlled respiration. Disturbances in acid-base balance and oxygenation had an unfavourable effect and delayed the regaining of consciousness.</p>","PeriodicalId":75483,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, resuscitation, and intensive therapy","volume":"3 1","pages":"57-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia, resuscitation, and intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

These studies investigating the difference between controlled respiration performed by manual technique and controlled respiration applied by means of a respirator during general anaesthesia, and assessing the influence of these methods on the immediate post-operative condition of the patient were carried out on 75 patients during abdominal operations. Gasometric tests in arterial blood were performed before premedication, at intervals of 30 min from the beginning of operation, and 10 min. after the removal of the endotracheal tube. Controlled respiration with a respirator is a more favourable method of pulmonary ventilation during general anaesthesia given for a long-lasting surgical operation. The manual technique of controlled respiration leads to respiratory alkalosis. The best results were obtained using a respirator with inspiratory volume of 10 ml/kg and respiratory frequency 10/min., which ensured normocapnia. It was observed that oxygenation of arterial blood was reduced postoperatively in all patients but the value of PaO2 was the lowest in patients on manual controlled respiration. Disturbances in acid-base balance and oxygenation had an unfavourable effect and delayed the regaining of consciousness.

腹部手术全麻时人工呼吸与呼吸器控制呼吸的比较。
本研究对75例腹部手术患者进行了研究,探讨了全麻过程中手动控制呼吸与呼吸机控制呼吸的差异,并评估了这些方法对患者术后即时状况的影响。在给药前、手术开始后30分钟和拔除气管内管后10分钟分别进行动脉血气测。在长时间外科手术的全身麻醉中,使用呼吸器控制呼吸是一种更有利的肺通气方法。控制呼吸的手工技术会导致呼吸性碱中毒。呼吸器吸气量为10 ml/kg,呼吸频率为10/min时效果最佳。,这确保了正常的运动能力。我们观察到所有患者术后动脉血氧合均降低,但PaO2值在手动控制呼吸的患者中最低。酸碱平衡和氧合的紊乱对恢复意识有不利影响,延迟了意识的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信