Simulation Performance Comparison of A*, GLS, RRT and PRM Path Planning Algorithms

A. Muhammad, N. R. Hasma Abdullah, Mohammed A. H. Ali, I. H. Shanono, R. Samad
{"title":"Simulation Performance Comparison of A*, GLS, RRT and PRM Path Planning Algorithms","authors":"A. Muhammad, N. R. Hasma Abdullah, Mohammed A. H. Ali, I. H. Shanono, R. Samad","doi":"10.1109/iscaie54458.2022.9794473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Path planning is among the essential qualities of an autonomous robot. The ability to build a collision-free pathway from a pre-defined point to another is known as path planning. There are a variety of approaches offered, all of which vary depending on the search pattern and the map representation method. In this study, four robust path planning algorithms, namely: Probabilistic Roadmaps (PRMs), A-star, the Rapidly Exploring Random Trees (RRTs), and Generalized Laser Simulator (GLS), were simulated and their performance was measured and compared according to the total path distance covered, search time and path smoothness. The result obtained reveals that all the four algorithms could navigate and generate a feasible through the 2D map successfully. The GLS algorithm performs better in all the measured parameters followed by the PRM, RRT, and then the A* algorithm.","PeriodicalId":395670,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 12th Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 12th Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iscaie54458.2022.9794473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Path planning is among the essential qualities of an autonomous robot. The ability to build a collision-free pathway from a pre-defined point to another is known as path planning. There are a variety of approaches offered, all of which vary depending on the search pattern and the map representation method. In this study, four robust path planning algorithms, namely: Probabilistic Roadmaps (PRMs), A-star, the Rapidly Exploring Random Trees (RRTs), and Generalized Laser Simulator (GLS), were simulated and their performance was measured and compared according to the total path distance covered, search time and path smoothness. The result obtained reveals that all the four algorithms could navigate and generate a feasible through the 2D map successfully. The GLS algorithm performs better in all the measured parameters followed by the PRM, RRT, and then the A* algorithm.
A*、GLS、RRT和PRM路径规划算法的仿真性能比较
路径规划是自主机器人的基本特性之一。从一个预定义的点到另一个点建立无碰撞路径的能力被称为路径规划。提供了多种方法,所有这些方法都根据搜索模式和映射表示方法而有所不同。本研究对概率路线图(Probabilistic Roadmaps, PRMs)、A-star、快速探索随机树(rapid Exploring Random Trees, RRTs)和广义激光模拟器(Generalized Laser Simulator, GLS)四种鲁棒路径规划算法进行了仿真,并根据覆盖的总路径距离、搜索时间和路径平滑度对其性能进行了测量和比较。结果表明,四种算法均能成功导航并生成可行的二维地图。GLS算法在所有测量参数中表现较好,其次是PRM、RRT,最后是A*算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信