PUNOMOĆJE DATO U INOSTRANSTVU ZA ZAKLjUČENjE UGOVORA O PROMETU NEPOKRETNOSTI KOJA SE NALAZI U DOMAĆOJ DRŽAVI – NEKOLIKO NAPOMENA IZ UGLA MEĐUNARODNOG PRIVATNOG PRAVA SRBIJE I MEĐUNARODNOG PRIVATNOG PRAVA CRNE GORE

Slavko Đorđević
{"title":"PUNOMOĆJE DATO U INOSTRANSTVU ZA ZAKLjUČENjE UGOVORA O PROMETU NEPOKRETNOSTI KOJA SE NALAZI U DOMAĆOJ DRŽAVI – NEKOLIKO NAPOMENA IZ UGLA MEĐUNARODNOG PRIVATNOG PRAVA SRBIJE I MEĐUNARODNOG PRIVATNOG PRAVA CRNE GORE","authors":"Slavko Đorđević","doi":"10.46793/xixmajsko.991dj","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Serbian and Montenegrin notaries deal very often with documents which were made abroad before foreign notary and in which the authority of an agent for conclusion of contracts for transfer of immovable property located in Serbia/Montenegro was embedded. This paper discusses the issue whether such documents are valid in respect of form (formal validity), since the rules on form of foreign law may differ from those of the laws of Serbia and Montenegro. In order to solve this issue, Serbian/Montenegrin notaries have to determine the law applicable to the form of agency. Considering that the PIL Act of Serbia and the PIL Act of Montenegro contain different conflict-of-law rules on agency and their substantive laws differently regulate the form in which agent’s authority for conclusion of such contracts has to be given, the issue is discussed from the point of view of each country respectively.","PeriodicalId":325482,"journal":{"name":"Pravna regulativa usluga u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i pravu Evropske Unije","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravna regulativa usluga u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i pravu Evropske Unije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/xixmajsko.991dj","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Serbian and Montenegrin notaries deal very often with documents which were made abroad before foreign notary and in which the authority of an agent for conclusion of contracts for transfer of immovable property located in Serbia/Montenegro was embedded. This paper discusses the issue whether such documents are valid in respect of form (formal validity), since the rules on form of foreign law may differ from those of the laws of Serbia and Montenegro. In order to solve this issue, Serbian/Montenegrin notaries have to determine the law applicable to the form of agency. Considering that the PIL Act of Serbia and the PIL Act of Montenegro contain different conflict-of-law rules on agency and their substantive laws differently regulate the form in which agent’s authority for conclusion of such contracts has to be given, the issue is discussed from the point of view of each country respectively.
塞尔维亚和黑山公证人经常处理在外国公证人面前在国外制作的文件,其中包含了签订塞尔维亚/黑山境内不动产转让合同的代理人的权力。本文讨论这类文件在形式(形式效力)方面是否有效的问题,因为外国法律的形式规则可能与塞尔维亚和黑山法律的形式规则不同。为了解决这一问题,塞尔维亚/黑山公证人必须确定代理形式适用的法律。考虑到塞尔维亚PIL法和黑山PIL法对代理的冲突法规则不同,实体法对代理订立合同的授权形式有不同的规定,本文分别从两国的角度进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信