Explaining the relational mechanisms and outcomes of multi-modal leader–member-exchange differentiation

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 Q4 BUSINESS
Patrick F. Bruning, Bradley J. Alge, Christine L. Jackson
{"title":"Explaining the relational mechanisms and outcomes of multi-modal leader–member-exchange differentiation","authors":"Patrick F. Bruning,&nbsp;Bradley J. Alge,&nbsp;Christine L. Jackson","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research suggests that multi-modal leader–member-exchange (LMX) differentiation could be the most problematic pattern of differentiation. Therefore, we outline a conceptual model to explain how multi-modal LMX differentiation can manifest as an LMX faultline—a special type of group faultline representing leader-sourced social divides between a leader's preferred subgroup and nonpreferred subgroup(s) within a specified collective. LMX faultlines have dimensions of perceived multi-modal LMX differentiation as well as faultline potency components of compositional diversity, unfairness of differentiation, and faultline agreement. We use LMX faultlines to explain how group members coalesce into subgroups based on concurrent forces of intra-subgroup cohesion and inter-subgroup polarization. Cohesion and polarization explain group-level outcomes (coordination, performance, and viability), subgroup-level insulation, and individual-level outcomes (performance, well-being, and conformity to the subgroup).</p>","PeriodicalId":47349,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","volume":"39 1","pages":"5-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.1652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research suggests that multi-modal leader–member-exchange (LMX) differentiation could be the most problematic pattern of differentiation. Therefore, we outline a conceptual model to explain how multi-modal LMX differentiation can manifest as an LMX faultline—a special type of group faultline representing leader-sourced social divides between a leader's preferred subgroup and nonpreferred subgroup(s) within a specified collective. LMX faultlines have dimensions of perceived multi-modal LMX differentiation as well as faultline potency components of compositional diversity, unfairness of differentiation, and faultline agreement. We use LMX faultlines to explain how group members coalesce into subgroups based on concurrent forces of intra-subgroup cohesion and inter-subgroup polarization. Cohesion and polarization explain group-level outcomes (coordination, performance, and viability), subgroup-level insulation, and individual-level outcomes (performance, well-being, and conformity to the subgroup).

解释多模态领导-成员-交换分化的关系机制和结果
研究表明,多模态领导-成员-交换(LMX)分化可能是最有问题的分化模式。因此,我们概述了一个概念模型来解释多模态LMX分化如何表现为LMX断层线——一种特殊类型的群体断层线,代表了特定集体中领导者偏好的子群体和非偏好的子群体之间源自领导者的社会鸿沟。LMX断层线具有感知到的多模态LMX分化维度,以及组成多样性、分化不公平和断层一致性的断层线潜能成分。我们使用LMX断层线来解释群体成员如何基于子群体内凝聚力和子群体间极化的共同力量合并成子群体。凝聚力和极化解释了群体层面的结果(协调、绩效和生存能力)、亚群体层面的隔离和个人层面的结果(绩效、幸福感和对子群体的顺从)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences (CJAS) is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed, international quarterly that publishes manuscripts with a strong theoretical foundation. The journal welcomes literature reviews, quantitative and qualitative studies as well as conceptual pieces. CJAS is an ISI-listed journal that publishes papers in all key disciplines of business. CJAS is a particularly suitable home for manuscripts of a crossdisciplinary nature. All papers must state in an explicit and compelling way their unique contribution to advancing theory and/or practice in the administrative sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信