Efficacy of Propiverine for Chronic Prostatitis / Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Hyung Jee Kim, J. Hong
{"title":"Efficacy of Propiverine for Chronic Prostatitis / Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome","authors":"Hyung Jee Kim, J. Hong","doi":"10.5213/JKCS.2008.12.2.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hypothesis / aims of study Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a common disorder to men and the syndrome is diagnosed only on the basis of symptoms, principally pain or discomfort in the pelvic region. However many patients have a urinary symptoms, especially storage symptoms such as frequency and urgency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of anticholinergics in a prospective randomized, single-blind trial to young and middle aged patients to exclude the effect of benign prostatic hyperplasia as possible. Study design, materials and methods Forty six men with CP/CPPS (age of third to fifth decades) were randomized in a single-blind fashion to receive either group 1; antibiotics of 15 patients, or group 2; antibiotics and propiverine (20mg, once daily) of 31 patients for 2 months. The NIH chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) were used to grade symptoms and the quality of life (QoL) impact at the start, 1 month and 2 months of the study. Results There was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 in about age and duration of the disease. In addition, no significant difference was found between group 1 and 2 in the scores of sub-factors of IPSS and NIH-CPSI at the time of baseline. No statistically significant difference in the NIH-CPSI total score and each domain was seen after treatment. Statistically significant difference in the storage symptom of IPSS was seen after treatment. Interpretation of results Only storage symptoms in CP/CPPS were responded to propiverine treatment, but not pain.","PeriodicalId":231333,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Continence Society","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Continence Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5213/JKCS.2008.12.2.158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a common disorder to men and the syndrome is diagnosed only on the basis of symptoms, principally pain or discomfort in the pelvic region. However many patients have a urinary symptoms, especially storage symptoms such as frequency and urgency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of anticholinergics in a prospective randomized, single-blind trial to young and middle aged patients to exclude the effect of benign prostatic hyperplasia as possible. Study design, materials and methods Forty six men with CP/CPPS (age of third to fifth decades) were randomized in a single-blind fashion to receive either group 1; antibiotics of 15 patients, or group 2; antibiotics and propiverine (20mg, once daily) of 31 patients for 2 months. The NIH chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) were used to grade symptoms and the quality of life (QoL) impact at the start, 1 month and 2 months of the study. Results There was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 in about age and duration of the disease. In addition, no significant difference was found between group 1 and 2 in the scores of sub-factors of IPSS and NIH-CPSI at the time of baseline. No statistically significant difference in the NIH-CPSI total score and each domain was seen after treatment. Statistically significant difference in the storage symptom of IPSS was seen after treatment. Interpretation of results Only storage symptoms in CP/CPPS were responded to propiverine treatment, but not pain.
丙丙胺治疗慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的疗效观察
慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CP/CPPS)是男性的一种常见疾病,该综合征仅根据症状诊断,主要是盆腔区域的疼痛或不适。但很多患者有尿路症状,尤其是积存症状如尿频和尿急。本研究的目的是通过一项前瞻性随机、单盲试验,评估抗胆碱能药物对中青年患者的疗效,尽可能排除良性前列腺增生的影响。研究设计、材料和方法将46名患有CP/CPPS的男性(年龄在30岁至50岁之间)以单盲方式随机分为两组:第一组;抗生素15例,即2组;抗生素和丙酸(20mg,每日1次)31例,疗程2个月。采用NIH慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH- cpsi)和国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)对研究开始、1个月和2个月时的症状和生活质量(QoL)影响进行评分。结果1、2组患者的年龄、病程无显著性差异。此外,1组和2组在基线时IPSS和NIH-CPSI的亚因子得分无显著差异。治疗后NIH-CPSI总分及各域差异无统计学意义。治疗后IPSS储存症状差异有统计学意义。结果解释:丙酸治疗对CP/CPPS患者只有储存症状有反应,而对疼痛无反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信