Social equity in sustainability certification systems for the built environment: understanding concepts, value, and practice implications

Adam Yeeles, Kim Sosalla-Bahr, Jennifer Ninete, Michael J. Wittmann, Francesqca E. Jimenez, Jeri Brittin
{"title":"Social equity in sustainability certification systems for the built environment: understanding concepts, value, and practice implications","authors":"Adam Yeeles, Kim Sosalla-Bahr, Jennifer Ninete, Michael J. Wittmann, Francesqca E. Jimenez, Jeri Brittin","doi":"10.1088/2634-4505/ac949d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainability certification systems play both an agenda-setting and practical role for a variety of architecture, planning, and engineering project types. The evolution of existing systems and the creation of new certification systems to address a broader set of social sustainability topics provide a unique opportunity to explore the different ways the industry is thinking about and applying social equity ideas to varied projects. We explore this diversity by conducting a content analysis of the guidance documents from eight sustainability certification systems to better understand how social equity is defined, the context in which the concept is applied, and how systems value the idea. The manner and degree to which systems engage with recognitional, procedural, and distributional aspects of social equity varies. Consequently, there is no guarantee that certification leads to real-world equitable outcomes. Moreover, sustainability professionals seeking to use certification systems to address unequal social impacts or benefits still need to bring a clear set of goals regarding equity of what and for whom, as well as ideas of how to measure and evaluate the distribution of social costs/benefits in order to put social equity into practice.","PeriodicalId":309041,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ac949d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sustainability certification systems play both an agenda-setting and practical role for a variety of architecture, planning, and engineering project types. The evolution of existing systems and the creation of new certification systems to address a broader set of social sustainability topics provide a unique opportunity to explore the different ways the industry is thinking about and applying social equity ideas to varied projects. We explore this diversity by conducting a content analysis of the guidance documents from eight sustainability certification systems to better understand how social equity is defined, the context in which the concept is applied, and how systems value the idea. The manner and degree to which systems engage with recognitional, procedural, and distributional aspects of social equity varies. Consequently, there is no guarantee that certification leads to real-world equitable outcomes. Moreover, sustainability professionals seeking to use certification systems to address unequal social impacts or benefits still need to bring a clear set of goals regarding equity of what and for whom, as well as ideas of how to measure and evaluate the distribution of social costs/benefits in order to put social equity into practice.
建筑环境可持续性认证体系中的社会公平:理解概念、价值和实践意义
可持续性认证系统对各种建筑、规划和工程项目类型都起着议程设置和实际作用。现有体系的演变和新认证体系的创建以解决更广泛的社会可持续性主题,为探索行业思考和将社会公平理念应用于各种项目的不同方式提供了独特的机会。我们通过对八个可持续发展认证体系的指导文件进行内容分析来探讨这种多样性,以更好地理解社会公平是如何定义的,这一概念的应用背景,以及系统如何重视这一理念。各系统参与社会公平的承认、程序和分配方面的方式和程度各不相同。因此,不能保证认证会带来现实世界中公平的结果。此外,寻求使用认证系统来解决不平等的社会影响或利益的可持续发展专业人士仍然需要提出一套关于什么和为谁公平的明确目标,以及如何衡量和评估社会成本/利益分配的想法,以便将社会公平付诸实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信