ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS AFFECTING LUMBAL FACET JOINT OSTEOARTHRITIS IN MRI SCAN

A. Anastasia, H. Sukmaningtyas, Agus Priambodo, Erna Setiawati
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS AFFECTING LUMBAL FACET JOINT OSTEOARTHRITIS IN MRI SCAN","authors":"A. Anastasia, H. Sukmaningtyas, Agus Priambodo, Erna Setiawati","doi":"10.14710/dmj.v11i1.32588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Osteoarthritis is a long-term, chronic disease that is usually marked by cartilage degeneration in the joints, which in turn induces bone friction. One of the subtype of this disease is facet joint osteoarthritis or in short, FJOA. In Indonesia, FJOA has not been commonly documented. The most common method for FJOA inspection is X-Ray modality. The usage of other radiology imaging, such as CT-Scan or MRI, are also used to evaluate erosion, osteophyte creation, subchondral sclerosis, and joint constriction. Nevertheless, the most ideal FJOA inspection method is still an ongoing debate due to strengths and weaknesses of each methods. CT scans are more widely used than MRIs and are typically less expensive. MRIs, however, are thought to be superior in regards to the detail of the image. Objective: To understand the effect of age, sex, and spinal level towards FJOA on MRI scanning. Method: This research used cross-sectional approach. Sample taken in this research were all radiology results from patients that fulfills inclusion criteria and had gone through MRI inspection in Jatinegara Premier Hospital. Age, sex, disk degeneration degree, and spinal level are the main focus for this study since those are the most common risk factor for FJOA. Results: 46.8% of FJOA were found in male patients while the other 53.2% were found in females. L4-5 and Grade 1 FJOA had the highest incidence found, with the amount of 29% and 48.4% respectively. There was no correlation between sex and FJOA degree based on Asymp. Sig of 0.255. There was also no correlation between age and FJOA degree based on Asymp. Sig of 0.702. However, there was a correlation between spinal level and disk degeneration degree with FJOA degree due to Asymp. Sig <0.05.  Conclusion: There was no significant relationship between age and sex to lumbar facet joint osteoarthritis and there was a significant relationship between spinal level and disk degeneration degree with lumbar facet joint osteoarthritis.","PeriodicalId":394284,"journal":{"name":"DIPONEGORO MEDICAL JOURNAL (JURNAL KEDOKTERAN DIPONEGORO)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIPONEGORO MEDICAL JOURNAL (JURNAL KEDOKTERAN DIPONEGORO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/dmj.v11i1.32588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis is a long-term, chronic disease that is usually marked by cartilage degeneration in the joints, which in turn induces bone friction. One of the subtype of this disease is facet joint osteoarthritis or in short, FJOA. In Indonesia, FJOA has not been commonly documented. The most common method for FJOA inspection is X-Ray modality. The usage of other radiology imaging, such as CT-Scan or MRI, are also used to evaluate erosion, osteophyte creation, subchondral sclerosis, and joint constriction. Nevertheless, the most ideal FJOA inspection method is still an ongoing debate due to strengths and weaknesses of each methods. CT scans are more widely used than MRIs and are typically less expensive. MRIs, however, are thought to be superior in regards to the detail of the image. Objective: To understand the effect of age, sex, and spinal level towards FJOA on MRI scanning. Method: This research used cross-sectional approach. Sample taken in this research were all radiology results from patients that fulfills inclusion criteria and had gone through MRI inspection in Jatinegara Premier Hospital. Age, sex, disk degeneration degree, and spinal level are the main focus for this study since those are the most common risk factor for FJOA. Results: 46.8% of FJOA were found in male patients while the other 53.2% were found in females. L4-5 and Grade 1 FJOA had the highest incidence found, with the amount of 29% and 48.4% respectively. There was no correlation between sex and FJOA degree based on Asymp. Sig of 0.255. There was also no correlation between age and FJOA degree based on Asymp. Sig of 0.702. However, there was a correlation between spinal level and disk degeneration degree with FJOA degree due to Asymp. Sig <0.05.  Conclusion: There was no significant relationship between age and sex to lumbar facet joint osteoarthritis and there was a significant relationship between spinal level and disk degeneration degree with lumbar facet joint osteoarthritis.
腰椎小关节骨性关节炎mri扫描危险因素分析
背景:骨关节炎是一种长期的慢性疾病,通常以关节软骨退行性变为特征,进而引起骨摩擦。这种疾病的一个亚型是小关节骨性关节炎,简称FJOA。在印度尼西亚,FJOA没有被普遍记录。FJOA检查最常用的方法是x射线模式。其他影像学检查,如ct扫描或MRI,也可用于评估糜烂、骨赘形成、软骨下硬化和关节收缩。然而,由于每种方法的优缺点,最理想的FJOA检测方法仍然是一个持续的争论。CT扫描比核磁共振成像应用更广泛,而且通常更便宜。然而,核磁共振成像在图像细节方面被认为是优越的。目的:了解年龄、性别、脊柱水平对FJOA MRI扫描的影响。方法:采用横断面研究方法。本研究样本均为符合纳入标准并在贾蒂内加拉一流医院接受MRI检查的患者的放射学结果。年龄、性别、椎间盘退变程度和脊柱水平是本研究的主要焦点,因为这些是FJOA最常见的危险因素。结果:FJOA中男性占46.8%,女性占53.2%。L4-5级和1级FJOA发生率最高,分别为29%和48.4%。基于Asymp的FJOA程度与性别无相关性。Sig = 0.255。基于Asymp的FJOA程度与年龄也没有相关性。Sig = 0.702。然而,脊柱水平和椎间盘退变程度与Asymp引起的FJOA程度相关。Sig < 0.05。结论:腰椎小关节骨性关节炎的发病与年龄、性别无显著相关性,腰椎水平和椎间盘退变程度与腰椎小关节骨性关节炎的发病有显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信