An Analysis of the Feasibility of Artificial Intelligence to Replace Lawyers

Weiyuan Wang
{"title":"An Analysis of the Feasibility of Artificial Intelligence to Replace Lawyers","authors":"Weiyuan Wang","doi":"10.22158/ape.v6n2p161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of artificial intelligence in justice is an irreversible trend, and it is going through a process of development from shallow to deep and from narrow to wide. It is in this context that the discussion on whether artificial intelligence can replace lawyers in the future and whether there is a need for the existence of lawyers begins. The impact and challenge of artificial intelligence to replace the lawyer system is still in the ethical, effectiveness and fairness of the three aspects of the controversy, lawyers also have the unique advantages of artificial intelligence can not replace. Therefore, this paper advocates that artificial intelligence in a narrow sense cannot replace lawyers, and has reservations about whether strong artificial intelligence can replace lawyers. Should adhere to the legal role of lawyers, to achieve the limited intervention of artificial intelligence, the use of a degree, to assist powerful.","PeriodicalId":219226,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Politics and Economics","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Politics and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/ape.v6n2p161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of artificial intelligence in justice is an irreversible trend, and it is going through a process of development from shallow to deep and from narrow to wide. It is in this context that the discussion on whether artificial intelligence can replace lawyers in the future and whether there is a need for the existence of lawyers begins. The impact and challenge of artificial intelligence to replace the lawyer system is still in the ethical, effectiveness and fairness of the three aspects of the controversy, lawyers also have the unique advantages of artificial intelligence can not replace. Therefore, this paper advocates that artificial intelligence in a narrow sense cannot replace lawyers, and has reservations about whether strong artificial intelligence can replace lawyers. Should adhere to the legal role of lawyers, to achieve the limited intervention of artificial intelligence, the use of a degree, to assist powerful.
人工智能取代律师的可行性分析
人工智能在司法领域的应用是一个不可逆转的趋势,正在经历一个由浅到深、由窄到宽的发展过程。正是在这样的背景下,关于未来人工智能能否取代律师,律师是否还有存在的必要的讨论才开始。人工智能取代律师制度的影响和挑战仍在伦理、有效性和公平性三个方面存在争议,律师也具有人工智能无法取代的独特优势。因此,本文主张狭义的人工智能不能替代律师,并对强人工智能能否替代律师持保留态度。应坚持律师的法律作用,实现人工智能的有限干预、利用程度、辅助力度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信