Effects of Microfinance Intervention on Multiple and Non-multiple Financing Clients: A Case of Gandaki Province of Nepal

Bharat Ram Dhungana, R. Chapagain, Deepesh Ranabhat
{"title":"Effects of Microfinance Intervention on Multiple and Non-multiple Financing Clients: A Case of Gandaki Province of Nepal","authors":"Bharat Ram Dhungana, R. Chapagain, Deepesh Ranabhat","doi":"10.3126/JNBS.V13I1.34703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to examine the effects of microfinance intervention on multiple and non-multiple borrowings clients in the Gandaki province of Nepal. Further, the study aims to explore the reasons for multiple borrowings and the impact of microfinance intervention on micro-enterprise creation, total investment, profit per month, income, and saving. The research is based on primary sources of data and confined to Muktinath Biikas Bank Limited (MBBL). Microfinance clients involving MBBL for the last five or more years are the respondents, and 311 MF clients were randomly selected from 10 branches of MBBL. Both descriptive and inferential statistics have been applied to find out the effects of microfinance intervention. The key reasons behind multiple financing are forced by friends, the presence of other MFIs, insufficient loan, meeting domestic requirements, repaying other MFIs loan, lending to others at high interest, and repaying a high-interest loan. There are significant differences between multiple and non-multiple financing clients in terms of micro-enterprise creation, total investment, profit per month, and saving. The result shows that non-multiple financing clients are more likely to earn more profit, create new business, and have the potential for large-scale investment. The mean score shows that non-multiple financing clients are saving more than multiple financing clients, indicating more commitment to saving for future funds requirement to expand the business. At last, the study concluded that the performance of non-multiple financing clients is significantly better than multiple financing clients. Since multiple financing creates problems if it is not controlled properly, so microfinance institutions (MFIs) and regulatory authorities should discourage multiple borrowing practices through proper regulation, adequate supply of loans, and its productive orientation.","PeriodicalId":146163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepalese Business Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepalese Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/JNBS.V13I1.34703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the effects of microfinance intervention on multiple and non-multiple borrowings clients in the Gandaki province of Nepal. Further, the study aims to explore the reasons for multiple borrowings and the impact of microfinance intervention on micro-enterprise creation, total investment, profit per month, income, and saving. The research is based on primary sources of data and confined to Muktinath Biikas Bank Limited (MBBL). Microfinance clients involving MBBL for the last five or more years are the respondents, and 311 MF clients were randomly selected from 10 branches of MBBL. Both descriptive and inferential statistics have been applied to find out the effects of microfinance intervention. The key reasons behind multiple financing are forced by friends, the presence of other MFIs, insufficient loan, meeting domestic requirements, repaying other MFIs loan, lending to others at high interest, and repaying a high-interest loan. There are significant differences between multiple and non-multiple financing clients in terms of micro-enterprise creation, total investment, profit per month, and saving. The result shows that non-multiple financing clients are more likely to earn more profit, create new business, and have the potential for large-scale investment. The mean score shows that non-multiple financing clients are saving more than multiple financing clients, indicating more commitment to saving for future funds requirement to expand the business. At last, the study concluded that the performance of non-multiple financing clients is significantly better than multiple financing clients. Since multiple financing creates problems if it is not controlled properly, so microfinance institutions (MFIs) and regulatory authorities should discourage multiple borrowing practices through proper regulation, adequate supply of loans, and its productive orientation.
小额信贷干预对多个和非多个融资客户的影响——以尼泊尔甘达基省为例
本研究的目的是考察小额信贷干预对尼泊尔甘达基省多次和非多次借款客户的影响。此外,本研究旨在探讨多重借贷的原因,以及小额信贷干预对微型企业创建、总投资、月利润、收入和储蓄的影响。该研究基于主要数据来源,仅限于Muktinath Biikas银行有限公司(MBBL)。调查对象为MBBL近5年及以上小额信贷客户,从MBBL 10家分行中随机抽取311名MF客户。本文采用描述性统计和推理统计两种方法来研究小额信贷干预的效果。多重融资背后的关键原因是朋友逼、其他小额信贷机构存在、贷款不足、满足国内要求、偿还其他小额信贷机构贷款、高息贷款给他人、偿还高息贷款。多融资客户与非多融资客户在微企业创建、总投资、月利润、储蓄等方面存在显著差异。结果表明,非多重融资客户更有可能获得更多的利润,创造新的业务,并具有大规模投资的潜力。平均得分表明,非多重融资客户比多重融资客户储蓄更多,表明更多的储蓄致力于未来的资金需求,以扩大业务。最后,研究得出非多个融资客户的绩效显著优于多个融资客户。由于多重融资如果控制不当会产生问题,因此小额信贷机构(mfi)和监管当局应通过适当的监管、充足的贷款供应和其生产性导向来阻止多重借贷行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信