The determination of bone age in the elbow as compared to the hand. A study in 390 children.

Revista interamericana de radiologia Pub Date : 1979-01-01
H Schedewie, A Braselman, E Willich, R Lachman
{"title":"The determination of bone age in the elbow as compared to the hand. A study in 390 children.","authors":"H Schedewie,&nbsp;A Braselman,&nbsp;E Willich,&nbsp;R Lachman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a prospective study, bone age (BA) from both hand and elbow was assessed in 390 children, aged 6-15 years, in order to determine: (a) whether or not BA assessment from the hand and from the elbow give comparable results, and (b) whether the accuracy of predicting skeletal age from the hand may be improved by the additional BA determination in the elbow. BA assessment in the hand was performed according to the method of Greulich and Pyle while the standards of Schinz and Baensch were used for the elbow. Statistical analysis of data was carried out according to age groups as well as according to groups of clinical diagnoses. With only one exception in the group of so-called \"healthy individuals\", there was no difference between \"hand age\" and \"elbow age\". Thus, except in a very small group of subjects, both methods of BA assessment were found to be equivalent in predicting skeletal age in children between 6-15 years. Equivocal results were obtained regarding the question of whether the accuracy of BA assessment in the hand may be improved by the simultaneous BA determination from the elbow. Until further studies on larger statistical material provide more conclusive information in this matter, we feel that the combined determination of BA in the hand and elbow is not warranted for clinical purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":76463,"journal":{"name":"Revista interamericana de radiologia","volume":"4 1","pages":"11-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista interamericana de radiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a prospective study, bone age (BA) from both hand and elbow was assessed in 390 children, aged 6-15 years, in order to determine: (a) whether or not BA assessment from the hand and from the elbow give comparable results, and (b) whether the accuracy of predicting skeletal age from the hand may be improved by the additional BA determination in the elbow. BA assessment in the hand was performed according to the method of Greulich and Pyle while the standards of Schinz and Baensch were used for the elbow. Statistical analysis of data was carried out according to age groups as well as according to groups of clinical diagnoses. With only one exception in the group of so-called "healthy individuals", there was no difference between "hand age" and "elbow age". Thus, except in a very small group of subjects, both methods of BA assessment were found to be equivalent in predicting skeletal age in children between 6-15 years. Equivocal results were obtained regarding the question of whether the accuracy of BA assessment in the hand may be improved by the simultaneous BA determination from the elbow. Until further studies on larger statistical material provide more conclusive information in this matter, we feel that the combined determination of BA in the hand and elbow is not warranted for clinical purposes.

测定肘部和手部的骨龄。一项针对390名儿童的研究。
在一项前瞻性研究中,对390名6-15岁的儿童进行了手部和肘部的骨龄(BA)评估,以确定:(a)手部和肘部的骨龄评估是否具有可比性,以及(b)通过肘部的额外BA测定是否可以提高手部骨骼年龄预测的准确性。手部BA评价采用Greulich和Pyle法,肘部BA评价采用Schinz和Baensch标准。按年龄分组和临床诊断分组对资料进行统计分析。在所谓的“健康个体”组中,只有一个例外,“手龄”和“肘龄”之间没有差异。因此,除了一小部分受试者外,两种BA评估方法在预测6-15岁儿童骨骼年龄方面是相同的。关于手肘同时测定BA是否可以提高手部BA评估的准确性,得到了模棱两可的结果。在进一步研究更大的统计资料提供更确凿的信息之前,我们认为手和肘部BA的联合测定不适合临床目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信