Too Small to Fail: Information Sharing Behavior in a US Municipal Election

Andrea L. Kavanaugh, Ziqian Song, Liuqing Li, E. Fox, Bethany Hsiao
{"title":"Too Small to Fail: Information Sharing Behavior in a US Municipal Election","authors":"Andrea L. Kavanaugh, Ziqian Song, Liuqing Li, E. Fox, Bethany Hsiao","doi":"10.1145/3396956.3396992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proximal communities in democratic societies comprise citizens, organizations, and governmental agencies, working together to identify and evaluate problems and opportunities in the public interest, build consensus around alternative approaches and solutions, and implement agreed upon policies. Communication and information sharing is critical to performing this collective work that involves not only face-to-face communication, but diverse media and technology whether offline (i.e., broadcast and print media) or online. We used topic modeling, social graphing and sentiment analysis to analyze information sharing behavior among individuals and organizations related to a geographic community and environs during municipal and state assembly elections in 2015. We investigate tweets, and Facebook posts and comments related to these elections as evidence for information sharing at the local level and/or of content relevant to the local community. Our findings suggest that the abundance of elections-relevant topics indicates that Twitter and FB were actively used for information sharing. The greater trust in local as opposed to non-local content and sources established in prior studies is consistent with our community level data in which sentiment expressed in our data is predominantly neutral. We argue that the greater trust in local as opposed to national sources of news, and in social media based on local social networks makes community-level groups and information sharing self-correcting and resilient, and thus, too small to fail.","PeriodicalId":118651,"journal":{"name":"The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3396992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proximal communities in democratic societies comprise citizens, organizations, and governmental agencies, working together to identify and evaluate problems and opportunities in the public interest, build consensus around alternative approaches and solutions, and implement agreed upon policies. Communication and information sharing is critical to performing this collective work that involves not only face-to-face communication, but diverse media and technology whether offline (i.e., broadcast and print media) or online. We used topic modeling, social graphing and sentiment analysis to analyze information sharing behavior among individuals and organizations related to a geographic community and environs during municipal and state assembly elections in 2015. We investigate tweets, and Facebook posts and comments related to these elections as evidence for information sharing at the local level and/or of content relevant to the local community. Our findings suggest that the abundance of elections-relevant topics indicates that Twitter and FB were actively used for information sharing. The greater trust in local as opposed to non-local content and sources established in prior studies is consistent with our community level data in which sentiment expressed in our data is predominantly neutral. We argue that the greater trust in local as opposed to national sources of news, and in social media based on local social networks makes community-level groups and information sharing self-correcting and resilient, and thus, too small to fail.
小到不能倒:美国市政选举中的信息共享行为
民主社会的近邻社区由公民、组织和政府机构组成,共同努力确定和评估符合公共利益的问题和机会,就替代方法和解决方案达成共识,并实施商定的政策。沟通和信息共享对于开展这一集体工作至关重要,这不仅涉及面对面交流,还涉及各种媒体和技术,无论是离线(即广播和印刷媒体)还是在线。我们使用主题建模、社会绘图和情感分析来分析2015年市政和州议会选举期间与地理社区和周边环境相关的个人和组织之间的信息共享行为。我们调查了与这些选举相关的推文、Facebook帖子和评论,作为地方层面信息共享和/或与当地社区相关内容的证据。我们的研究结果表明,大量与选举相关的话题表明Twitter和FB被积极用于信息共享。与先前研究中建立的非本地内容和来源相比,对本地内容和来源的更大信任与我们的社区层面数据一致,其中数据中表达的情绪主要是中立的。我们认为,与国家新闻来源相比,对地方新闻来源的更大信任,以及对基于地方社交网络的社交媒体的更大信任,使社区一级的团体和信息共享具有自我纠正和弹性,因此,太小而不能失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信