{"title":"The introduction of ceramics in the Ertebølle Culture","authors":"K. Povlsen","doi":"10.1080/21662282.2013.904127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pottery production has long been viewed as an integrated part of the Neolithic package. Instances of ceramic production in hunter-gatherer contexts have been explained by influences from early farmers. This has also been the case for the ceramics of the Ertebølle Culture. Recently, however, the discussion has become more nuanced and alternative explanations have emerged. This article argues that a focus on the life cycle of the early ceramics as well as an understanding of technology transfer as a process of cultural transmission can potentially broaden the perspective on the uptake of ceramics technology by the hunter-gatherers of northern Europe. The chaîne opératoire of the Ertebølle ceramics is analysed and a model of how a technology moves from one social setting to another is presented. In the light of this work, different approaches to the introduction of ceramics in the western Baltic are discussed. It is argued that important elements of the Ertebølle pottery tradition came from the east via Baltic exchange networks. However, the tradition was not directly transferred, and important elements appear along the way. Whether some of these elements can be ascribed to agro-pastoralist groups in the south is still uncertain.","PeriodicalId":191998,"journal":{"name":"Danish Journal of Archaeology","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish Journal of Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21662282.2013.904127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
Pottery production has long been viewed as an integrated part of the Neolithic package. Instances of ceramic production in hunter-gatherer contexts have been explained by influences from early farmers. This has also been the case for the ceramics of the Ertebølle Culture. Recently, however, the discussion has become more nuanced and alternative explanations have emerged. This article argues that a focus on the life cycle of the early ceramics as well as an understanding of technology transfer as a process of cultural transmission can potentially broaden the perspective on the uptake of ceramics technology by the hunter-gatherers of northern Europe. The chaîne opératoire of the Ertebølle ceramics is analysed and a model of how a technology moves from one social setting to another is presented. In the light of this work, different approaches to the introduction of ceramics in the western Baltic are discussed. It is argued that important elements of the Ertebølle pottery tradition came from the east via Baltic exchange networks. However, the tradition was not directly transferred, and important elements appear along the way. Whether some of these elements can be ascribed to agro-pastoralist groups in the south is still uncertain.
陶器生产长期以来一直被视为新石器时代整体的一个组成部分。早期农民的影响解释了狩猎采集时代陶瓷生产的例子。Ertebølle文化的陶瓷也是如此。然而,最近的讨论变得更加微妙,出现了不同的解释。本文认为,关注早期陶瓷的生命周期以及对技术转移作为文化传播过程的理解,可能会拓宽北欧狩猎采集者对陶瓷技术的吸收视角。本文分析了Ertebølle陶瓷的cha ne opatire,并提出了一种技术如何从一种社会环境转移到另一种社会环境的模型。根据这项工作,讨论了在波罗的海西部引入陶瓷的不同方法。有人认为,Ertebølle陶器传统的重要元素是通过波罗的海交换网络从东方传入的。然而,传统并没有被直接转移,重要的元素是在这个过程中出现的。这些因素中的一些是否可以归因于南方的农牧民群体仍不确定。