Comparison of Reading Comprehension with respect to Text Type, Grade Level and Test Type

Muhammet Bastug
{"title":"Comparison of Reading Comprehension with respect to Text Type, Grade Level and Test Type","authors":"Muhammet Bastug","doi":"10.15345/IOJES.2014.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article History: Received 25.11.2013 Received in revised form 13.05.2014 Accepted 31.05.2014 Available online 10.08.2014 It was aimed in this study to compare students’ reading comprehension levels with respect to the variables of text type, grade level and test type. To this aim, the research was carried out in the scanning model. A total of 1028 4th and 5th grade students participated in the research. In assessing reading comprehension skills; open-ended, multiple choice and cloze tests, which were developed based on narrative and informative texts found in course books for students’ respective grade levels, were used. T-tests and variance analysis were employed in analyzing the data. It was observed at the end of the research that students’ reading comprehension skills did not statistically differ. On the other hand, reading comprehension skills did differ significantly with respect to text type in the favor of narrative texts. That is, students are more successful in comprehending narrative texts compared to informative ones. Another finding is that students’ reading comprehension skills significantly differed with respect to test type in the favor of multiple-choice tests. That is, students scored higher in multiple-choice tests than in open-ended and cloze tests. The research findings were discussed in relation to the relevant literature. © 2014 IOJES. All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":358961,"journal":{"name":"International Online Journal of Educational Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Online Journal of Educational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15345/IOJES.2014.02.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Article History: Received 25.11.2013 Received in revised form 13.05.2014 Accepted 31.05.2014 Available online 10.08.2014 It was aimed in this study to compare students’ reading comprehension levels with respect to the variables of text type, grade level and test type. To this aim, the research was carried out in the scanning model. A total of 1028 4th and 5th grade students participated in the research. In assessing reading comprehension skills; open-ended, multiple choice and cloze tests, which were developed based on narrative and informative texts found in course books for students’ respective grade levels, were used. T-tests and variance analysis were employed in analyzing the data. It was observed at the end of the research that students’ reading comprehension skills did not statistically differ. On the other hand, reading comprehension skills did differ significantly with respect to text type in the favor of narrative texts. That is, students are more successful in comprehending narrative texts compared to informative ones. Another finding is that students’ reading comprehension skills significantly differed with respect to test type in the favor of multiple-choice tests. That is, students scored higher in multiple-choice tests than in open-ended and cloze tests. The research findings were discussed in relation to the relevant literature. © 2014 IOJES. All rights reserved
阅读理解在文本类型、年级水平和测试类型方面的比较
文章历史:收稿日期:2013年11月25日收稿日期:13.05.2014收稿日期:31.05.2014在线发布日期:10.08.2014本研究旨在比较学生在文本类型、年级水平和测试类型变量方面的阅读理解水平。为此,在扫描模型中进行了研究。共有1028名四、五年级学生参与了研究。评估阅读理解能力;开放式、选择题和完形填空测试是根据学生各自年级的课本上的叙述和信息文本开发的。数据分析采用t检验和方差分析。在研究结束时,我们观察到学生的阅读理解能力没有统计学上的差异。另一方面,阅读理解能力在文本类型方面确实存在显著差异,有利于叙事文本。也就是说,学生在理解叙事性文本方面比信息性文本更成功。另一个发现是,学生的阅读理解能力在选择题测试类型方面存在显著差异。也就是说,学生在选择题测试中的得分高于开放式和完形测试。并结合相关文献对研究结果进行了讨论。©2014 iojes。版权所有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信