From Noble Dress to Jewish Attire: Jewish Appearances in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the Holy Roman Empire

Cornelia Aust
{"title":"From Noble Dress to Jewish Attire: Jewish Appearances in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the Holy Roman Empire","authors":"Cornelia Aust","doi":"10.1515/9783110635942-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the different styles of attire that had emerged by the eighteenth century among Jews in Poland and German-speaking lands. It argues that Jews in both regions developed their attire from older styles of dress that had fallen out of fashion among German burghers and Polish noblemen, respectively. Nevertheless, the distinguishability of Jews and Christians and distinctions among Jews according to social status, gender, and geographic origin were never clear-cut issues. Picturing a Hasidic Jew in Jerusalem or New York today, with a long black coat, a silk or satin caftan on Sabbath, and a black (fur) hat, many believe that this or similar attire has been the typical dress of (East European) Jews throughout time. However, dress and appearance have always undergone continual change and are a rather fluid marker of identity and belonging. Though Jewish law traditionally prescribes that Jews be distinguishable from their non-Jewish neighbors, and Christian and Jewish authorities have since the thirteenth century explicitly stipulated distinctive dress, such normative prescriptions do not allow for the conclusion that Jewish men and women have always been recognizable by their dress. Likewise, the fact that Jews were sometimes forced to wear distinctive signs does not mean that they were otherwise invisible as Jews or could pass as Christians when not wearing a discriminatory sign. Nevertheless, by the end of the eighteenth century there seems to have been a clear sense of a “Jewish attire”. 1 On today’s Hasidic dress see: Eric Silverman: A Cultural History of Jewish Dress. London 2013, 112–131. 2 On discriminatory signs in late medieval Italy see: Flora Cassen: Marking the Jews in Renaissance Italy. Politics, Religion, and the Power of Symbols. Cambridge 2017. For passing as a non-Jew see for a modern example: Kerry Wallach: Passing Illusions. Jewish Visibility in Weimar Germany. Ann Arbor 2017. Open Access. ©2019 Cornelia Aust, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110635942-006 In this article, I trace some developments concerning the dress and appearance of Jews, mostly men, of the early modern period in German-speaking lands, with a particular emphasis on Fürth (near Nuremberg) in Middle Franconia and Frankfurt am Main, and compare them with similar developments in early modern Poland. I ask how and when such a general term like “Jewish attire” emerged and what it meant for those who wore so-called “Jewish attire” or “Jewish dress”. Did they even conceive it as “Jewish dress”? Where and when did visual difference play a particular role? Looking at such different sources as sumptuary laws, inventories, “ethnographic” descriptions, and costume books, I sketch out a highly complex picture in which perceived differences intersected, not only between Jews and Christians, but also among Jews themselves, concerning, for example, socioeconomic status, gender, and geography. The External Perception of Jewish Dress The insistence of Christian and Jewish authorities that Jews and Christians should be easily distinguishable in their outward appearance points to the possibility that, by the thirteenth century, Jews and Christians could often not be easily told apart. Both the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215 and the thirteenth-century takkanot Shum – the ordinances of the three Jewish communities of Speyer, Worms, and Mainz in the Rhineland – insisted that Jews had to be visually distinguishable from their Christian neighbors. Regulations of religious, royal, and urban authorities following the Fourth Lateran Council usually insisted on distinctive signs, including different forms of yellow (or red) patch, or specific hats, while rabbinical and communal Jewish ordinances insisted more generally that Jewish men not cut their hair and beard like Christians, that Jews observe the biblical prohibition of sha’atnets (the mixing of wool and linen), and that they generally not dress like Christians. As Flora Cassen has shown, this 3 On the dress of Jewish women in the early modern period see: Cornelia Aust: Covering the Female Jewish Body. Dress and Dress Regulations in Early Modern Ashkenaz, in: Central Europe 17 (2019) [forthcoming]. 4 In antiquity, however, Cohen argues that Jews were not visibly distinctive from their environment: Shaye J. D. Cohen: The Beginnings of Jewishness. Boundaries, Varieties, Uncertainties. Berkeley 1999, 27–28, 31–33. 5 Alfred Rubens: A History of Jewish Costume, 2nd ed. London 1973, 80–97. On the medieval Jewish hat see: Sara Lipton: Dark Mirror. The Medieval Origins of Anti-Jewish Iconography. New York 2014, 21–54; Naomi Lubrich: The Wandering Hat. Iterations of the Medieval Jewish From Noble Dress to Jewish Attire 91","PeriodicalId":131345,"journal":{"name":"Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110635942-006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article examines the different styles of attire that had emerged by the eighteenth century among Jews in Poland and German-speaking lands. It argues that Jews in both regions developed their attire from older styles of dress that had fallen out of fashion among German burghers and Polish noblemen, respectively. Nevertheless, the distinguishability of Jews and Christians and distinctions among Jews according to social status, gender, and geographic origin were never clear-cut issues. Picturing a Hasidic Jew in Jerusalem or New York today, with a long black coat, a silk or satin caftan on Sabbath, and a black (fur) hat, many believe that this or similar attire has been the typical dress of (East European) Jews throughout time. However, dress and appearance have always undergone continual change and are a rather fluid marker of identity and belonging. Though Jewish law traditionally prescribes that Jews be distinguishable from their non-Jewish neighbors, and Christian and Jewish authorities have since the thirteenth century explicitly stipulated distinctive dress, such normative prescriptions do not allow for the conclusion that Jewish men and women have always been recognizable by their dress. Likewise, the fact that Jews were sometimes forced to wear distinctive signs does not mean that they were otherwise invisible as Jews or could pass as Christians when not wearing a discriminatory sign. Nevertheless, by the end of the eighteenth century there seems to have been a clear sense of a “Jewish attire”. 1 On today’s Hasidic dress see: Eric Silverman: A Cultural History of Jewish Dress. London 2013, 112–131. 2 On discriminatory signs in late medieval Italy see: Flora Cassen: Marking the Jews in Renaissance Italy. Politics, Religion, and the Power of Symbols. Cambridge 2017. For passing as a non-Jew see for a modern example: Kerry Wallach: Passing Illusions. Jewish Visibility in Weimar Germany. Ann Arbor 2017. Open Access. ©2019 Cornelia Aust, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110635942-006 In this article, I trace some developments concerning the dress and appearance of Jews, mostly men, of the early modern period in German-speaking lands, with a particular emphasis on Fürth (near Nuremberg) in Middle Franconia and Frankfurt am Main, and compare them with similar developments in early modern Poland. I ask how and when such a general term like “Jewish attire” emerged and what it meant for those who wore so-called “Jewish attire” or “Jewish dress”. Did they even conceive it as “Jewish dress”? Where and when did visual difference play a particular role? Looking at such different sources as sumptuary laws, inventories, “ethnographic” descriptions, and costume books, I sketch out a highly complex picture in which perceived differences intersected, not only between Jews and Christians, but also among Jews themselves, concerning, for example, socioeconomic status, gender, and geography. The External Perception of Jewish Dress The insistence of Christian and Jewish authorities that Jews and Christians should be easily distinguishable in their outward appearance points to the possibility that, by the thirteenth century, Jews and Christians could often not be easily told apart. Both the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215 and the thirteenth-century takkanot Shum – the ordinances of the three Jewish communities of Speyer, Worms, and Mainz in the Rhineland – insisted that Jews had to be visually distinguishable from their Christian neighbors. Regulations of religious, royal, and urban authorities following the Fourth Lateran Council usually insisted on distinctive signs, including different forms of yellow (or red) patch, or specific hats, while rabbinical and communal Jewish ordinances insisted more generally that Jewish men not cut their hair and beard like Christians, that Jews observe the biblical prohibition of sha’atnets (the mixing of wool and linen), and that they generally not dress like Christians. As Flora Cassen has shown, this 3 On the dress of Jewish women in the early modern period see: Cornelia Aust: Covering the Female Jewish Body. Dress and Dress Regulations in Early Modern Ashkenaz, in: Central Europe 17 (2019) [forthcoming]. 4 In antiquity, however, Cohen argues that Jews were not visibly distinctive from their environment: Shaye J. D. Cohen: The Beginnings of Jewishness. Boundaries, Varieties, Uncertainties. Berkeley 1999, 27–28, 31–33. 5 Alfred Rubens: A History of Jewish Costume, 2nd ed. London 1973, 80–97. On the medieval Jewish hat see: Sara Lipton: Dark Mirror. The Medieval Origins of Anti-Jewish Iconography. New York 2014, 21–54; Naomi Lubrich: The Wandering Hat. Iterations of the Medieval Jewish From Noble Dress to Jewish Attire 91
从贵族服饰到犹太服饰:犹太人在波兰立陶宛联邦和神圣罗马帝国的形象
本文考察了十八世纪波兰和德语区犹太人之间出现的不同风格的服装。文章认为,这两个地区的犹太人的服装都是由德国市民和波兰贵族各自不再流行的老式服装演变而来的。然而,犹太人和基督徒的区别以及犹太人之间根据社会地位、性别和地理来源的区别从来都不是明确的问题。想象一下今天在耶路撒冷或纽约的哈西德派犹太人,在安息日穿着黑色长外套,丝绸或缎子长袍,戴着黑色(毛皮)帽子,许多人认为这种或类似的装束一直是(东欧)犹太人的典型着装。然而,服装和外表总是经历着不断的变化,是身份和归属的一个相当不稳定的标志。虽然犹太律法传统上规定犹太人要与非犹太邻居区分开来,而且基督教和犹太当局自13世纪以来就明确规定了独特的服装,但这些规范的规定并不允许得出这样的结论,即犹太人的男女总是可以通过他们的服装来识别。同样,犹太人有时被迫佩戴特殊标志这一事实并不意味着他们作为犹太人是隐形的,或者如果不佩戴歧视性标志,他们就可以冒充基督徒。然而,到18世纪末,似乎已经有了一种明确的“犹太服装”的感觉。关于今天的哈西德派服饰,请参见:埃里克·西尔弗曼:犹太服饰的文化史。伦敦奥运会,2013,112-131。关于中世纪晚期意大利的歧视性标志,参见:弗洛拉·卡森:意大利文艺复兴时期的犹太人标志。政治、宗教和象征的力量。2017年剑桥。关于作为非犹太人的逝去,请看一个现代的例子:克里·瓦拉赫:逝去的幻象。魏玛德国的犹太人可见度。2017年安娜堡。开放获取。©2019 Cornelia Aust, De Gruyter出版。本作品采用知识共享署名-非商业-非衍生品4.0国际许可协议。https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110635942-006在这篇文章中,我追溯了一些关于犹太人的服装和外表的发展,主要是男性,在德语国家的近代早期,特别强调在法兰克中部的f rth(靠近纽伦堡)和美因河畔法兰克福,并将它们与近代早期波兰的类似发展进行比较。我问他们,“犹太服装”这样一个笼统的术语是如何以及何时出现的,它对那些穿着所谓“犹太服装”或“犹太服装”的人意味着什么。他们甚至认为这是“犹太服装”吗?视觉差异在何时何地发挥了特殊作用?通过观察诸如奢侈品法、库存、“人种学”描述和服装书籍等不同的来源,我勾勒出了一幅高度复杂的画面,其中不仅存在于犹太人和基督徒之间,而且存在于犹太人自己之间,涉及到诸如社会经济地位、性别和地理等方面。基督教和犹太当局坚持认为,犹太人和基督徒应该很容易从外表上区分出来,这表明,到13世纪,犹太人和基督徒往往不容易被区分开来。1215年的第四次拉特兰会议和13世纪的takkanot Shum(莱茵兰的施佩尔、Worms和美因茨三个犹太社区的法令)都坚持认为,犹太人必须在视觉上与他们的基督徒邻居区分开来。在第四次拉特兰会议之后,宗教、王室和城市当局的规定通常坚持不同的标志,包括不同形式的黄色(或红色)贴片,或特定的帽子,而拉比和犹太社区的条例更普遍地坚持犹太男人不像基督徒那样剪头发和胡子,犹太人遵守圣经中禁止的sha 'atnets(羊毛和亚麻的混合),他们通常不像基督徒那样穿着。正如弗洛拉·卡森所展示的,这幅关于近代早期犹太妇女服装的图见:科妮莉亚·奥斯特:覆盖犹太女性的身体。现代早期阿什肯纳兹人的着装和着装规定,中:中欧17(2019)[即将出版]。然而,在古代,科恩认为犹太人与他们的环境并没有明显的区别:沙耶·j·d·科恩:犹太人的起源。边界,多样性,不确定性。伯克利,1999,27 - 28,31 - 33。5阿尔弗雷德·鲁本斯:犹太服装的历史,第二版,伦敦1973,80-97。关于中世纪犹太人的帽子,请参见:萨拉·利普顿:黑暗的镜子。反犹太肖像的中世纪起源。纽约2014,21-54;娜奥米·鲁维奇:流浪的帽子。中世纪犹太人从贵族服饰到犹太服饰的演变
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信