Hadith and the Challenges of Islamic Moderation

Ahmad Musyafiq, Tafsir Tafsir
{"title":"Hadith and the Challenges of Islamic Moderation","authors":"Ahmad Musyafiq, Tafsir Tafsir","doi":"10.4108/EAI.14-10-2020.2303836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Hadith is one of the arguments for extreme attitudes and actions. This paper will analyze why it happens and what the solutions are. Through a contextual hermeneutic approach, this paper found several things. Regarding the use of hadith as one of the arguments for extreme attitudes and actions, this paper found two factors. First, the domination of the Hadith normativity which is positioned as the normativity of al-Qur’an. Whereas the Hadith normativity status is different from al-Qur’an, which in terms of wurūd is qaṭ’īy. Second, the domination of the use of the textual understanding method, especially after there were wide openings for the entry of transnational Islamic organizations. Regarding the solution, this paper offers three notions. First, reducing the dominance of Hadith normativity. This can be done by involving the social sciences and humanities approaches in understanding it. Second, promoting the use of contextual understanding methods, without denying the textual understanding method. Third, using the Sīrah Nabawiyyah as part of the normative sources of the Hadith Nabawi context.","PeriodicalId":127286,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Islamic History and Civilization, ICON-ISHIC 2020, 14 October, Semarang, Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Islamic History and Civilization, ICON-ISHIC 2020, 14 October, Semarang, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.14-10-2020.2303836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. Hadith is one of the arguments for extreme attitudes and actions. This paper will analyze why it happens and what the solutions are. Through a contextual hermeneutic approach, this paper found several things. Regarding the use of hadith as one of the arguments for extreme attitudes and actions, this paper found two factors. First, the domination of the Hadith normativity which is positioned as the normativity of al-Qur’an. Whereas the Hadith normativity status is different from al-Qur’an, which in terms of wurūd is qaṭ’īy. Second, the domination of the use of the textual understanding method, especially after there were wide openings for the entry of transnational Islamic organizations. Regarding the solution, this paper offers three notions. First, reducing the dominance of Hadith normativity. This can be done by involving the social sciences and humanities approaches in understanding it. Second, promoting the use of contextual understanding methods, without denying the textual understanding method. Third, using the Sīrah Nabawiyyah as part of the normative sources of the Hadith Nabawi context.
圣训和伊斯兰温和派的挑战
. 圣训是极端态度和行为的论据之一。本文将分析它发生的原因和解决方案。通过语境解释学的方法,本文发现了几点。将圣训作为极端态度和行为的论据之一,本文发现了两个因素。首先,圣训规范性的主导地位被定位为古兰经的规范性。然而圣训的规范性地位与古兰经不同,古兰经的wurūd是qahi ' y。第二,文本理解方法的使用占主导地位,特别是在跨国伊斯兰组织进入之后。对于解决这一问题,本文提出了三个思路。第一,降低圣训规范的主导地位。这可以通过涉及社会科学和人文科学的方法来理解它。第二,在不否定文本理解方法的前提下,提倡使用语境理解方法。第三,使用圣拉·纳巴威耶作为纳巴威圣训背景的一部分规范来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信