The “soft edge”: Heritage, special character, and new planning directives in Aotearoa cities

Carolyn Hill
{"title":"The “soft edge”: Heritage, special character, and new planning directives in Aotearoa cities","authors":"Carolyn Hill","doi":"10.24135/ijara.v22i22.715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Divergent visions for urban form are currently contesting the future of cities in Aotearoa. Severe pressures of population growth, inadequate housing supply, and unsustainable transport systems are raising a spectrum of voices on the appropriate planning response. The heritage field is enfolded in these debates, as intensification pressures have amplified questions about the value of historic urban fabric and the planning mechanisms that sustain it. To what extent should cities’ existing areas be retained or developed, and who gets to decide? \nFocusing on the “soft edge” of heritage—early suburbs valorised as “special character”—the paper traces the history of heritage-making in urban Aotearoa and its role in maintaining the ontological security of the settler state. It first explores the processes of identifying and managing historic urban forms that have gradually evolved through Aotearoa’s planning legislation, from the early town planning acts to the Resource Management Act 1991. It then analyses the tension between contemporary urban planning directions and historic places conservation, exploring the concept of “amenity,” which is implicated in both. It concludes with some avenues for deeper collaboration between planning policy and heritage-making for more spatially and culturally equitable cities.","PeriodicalId":403565,"journal":{"name":"Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24135/ijara.v22i22.715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Divergent visions for urban form are currently contesting the future of cities in Aotearoa. Severe pressures of population growth, inadequate housing supply, and unsustainable transport systems are raising a spectrum of voices on the appropriate planning response. The heritage field is enfolded in these debates, as intensification pressures have amplified questions about the value of historic urban fabric and the planning mechanisms that sustain it. To what extent should cities’ existing areas be retained or developed, and who gets to decide? Focusing on the “soft edge” of heritage—early suburbs valorised as “special character”—the paper traces the history of heritage-making in urban Aotearoa and its role in maintaining the ontological security of the settler state. It first explores the processes of identifying and managing historic urban forms that have gradually evolved through Aotearoa’s planning legislation, from the early town planning acts to the Resource Management Act 1991. It then analyses the tension between contemporary urban planning directions and historic places conservation, exploring the concept of “amenity,” which is implicated in both. It concludes with some avenues for deeper collaboration between planning policy and heritage-making for more spatially and culturally equitable cities.
“软边缘”:奥特罗亚城市的遗产、特色和新规划指令
对城市形态的不同愿景目前正在争夺奥特罗阿城市的未来。人口增长的严重压力、住房供应不足和不可持续的运输系统引起了关于适当规划对策的各种声音。遗产领域被卷入了这些争论,因为日益加剧的压力放大了关于历史城市结构的价值和维持它的规划机制的问题。城市现有区域应该保留或开发到什么程度,谁来决定?本文着眼于遗产的“软边缘”——早期郊区被评价为“特殊特征”——追溯了奥特罗阿城市遗产制造的历史及其在维护定居者国家本体论安全方面的作用。它首先探讨了识别和管理历史城市形式的过程,这些形式是通过奥特罗阿的规划立法逐渐演变而来的,从早期的城镇规划法到1991年的资源管理法。然后分析了当代城市规划方向和历史遗迹保护之间的紧张关系,探索了“舒适”的概念,这两者都涉及到。报告最后提出了规划政策和遗产制定之间更深层次合作的一些途径,以实现城市空间和文化上的更公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信