MURSAL HADEETHS IN MUSANNAF OF ABD RAZZAQ IN THE CHAPTER OF JUMUAH (FRIDAY PRAYER): A CRITICAL ANALYSIS

Cut Linda Marheni
{"title":"MURSAL HADEETHS IN MUSANNAF OF ABD RAZZAQ IN THE CHAPTER OF JUMUAH (FRIDAY PRAYER): A CRITICAL ANALYSIS","authors":"Cut Linda Marheni","doi":"10.37249/as-salam.v3i1.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to identify and study the mursal (stopped) hadeeth (prophet tradition) in the mentioned chapter of the Musannaf, in order to know which of them can be raised to the level of Hasan lighairih (hadeeth whose final verdict is good because of support of its witnesses and follow-up), which is can be accepted. The study is done to both of their sanad (chain of transmitters ) and matn (the body text of hadeeth), using the theories of hadeeth science. This study was done by firstly, analyzing the conditions of their ruwat (narrators), then evaluating the shawahid (the same hadeeth that is narrated through the different chain as witnesses ) and mutaba'at (follow-ups).  The research finds that most of the narrators of those hadeeths mursal are thiqah (trustworthy ), and all of four mursal hadeeths are acceptable, for they can be raised to the level of hasan lighairih. This  finding supports the importance of the Musannaf as a sufficient encyclopedia of hadeeths and Islamic jurisprudence for one who seeks the verification of Islamic law, though it does not have the standard that all the hadeeths it contains must be shahih (sound), but the weak hadeeths in it are potential to be upgraded to the accepted level.","PeriodicalId":361366,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal As-Salam","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal As-Salam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37249/as-salam.v3i1.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to identify and study the mursal (stopped) hadeeth (prophet tradition) in the mentioned chapter of the Musannaf, in order to know which of them can be raised to the level of Hasan lighairih (hadeeth whose final verdict is good because of support of its witnesses and follow-up), which is can be accepted. The study is done to both of their sanad (chain of transmitters ) and matn (the body text of hadeeth), using the theories of hadeeth science. This study was done by firstly, analyzing the conditions of their ruwat (narrators), then evaluating the shawahid (the same hadeeth that is narrated through the different chain as witnesses ) and mutaba'at (follow-ups).  The research finds that most of the narrators of those hadeeths mursal are thiqah (trustworthy ), and all of four mursal hadeeths are acceptable, for they can be raised to the level of hasan lighairih. This  finding supports the importance of the Musannaf as a sufficient encyclopedia of hadeeths and Islamic jurisprudence for one who seeks the verification of Islamic law, though it does not have the standard that all the hadeeths it contains must be shahih (sound), but the weak hadeeths in it are potential to be upgraded to the accepted level.
《星期五的祈祷》一章中穆萨纳夫的摩撒哈迪斯:一个批判性的分析
本研究的目的是识别和研究《穆萨纳》中提到的章节中的壁画(停止)圣训(先知传统),以了解其中哪些可以提升到Hasan lighairih(圣训,其最终判决是好的,因为它的证人和后续的支持)的水平,这是可以接受的。这项研究是利用圣训科学的理论,对他们的sanad(传递者链)和matn(圣训的正文)进行的。本研究首先分析了他们的ruwat(叙述者)的条件,然后评估了shawahid(通过不同的链条作为证人叙述的相同的圣训)和mutaba'at(随访者)。研究发现,这些圣训壁画的叙述者大多是可信的,四幅圣训壁画的叙述者都是可以接受的,因为它们可以被提升到hasan lighairih的水平。这一发现支持了《穆萨纳夫》作为一个充分的圣训和伊斯兰法学百科全书的重要性,对于寻求伊斯兰法律的验证的人来说,尽管它没有规定它所包含的所有圣训都必须是shahih(健全)的标准,但其中薄弱的圣训有可能被提升到可接受的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信