{"title":"Simulation Dominated Approach versus Video Dominated Approach in Teaching Consecutive Interpreting to Undergraduates: An Exploratory Comparison Study","authors":"Xiangdong Li","doi":"10.7764/ONOMAZEIN.44.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Video dominated instruction (VDI) and simulation dominated instruction (SDI) are commonly practised in interpreter training, and yet their teaching effects have not been adequately researched so far. The present study was intended to compare the effectiveness \nof the two instructional approaches in teaching consecutive interpreting (CI) to third-year \nundergraduates. A quasi-experimental two-group pre-test/post-test comparison design was \nused. Sixty-two students took a pre-test on consecutive interpreting skills and completed \na pre-self-assessment to rate their competence in eleven learning objectives at the beginning of a consecutive interpreting course. Thirty-one students in class one as the comparison \ngroup received VDI, while thirty-one students in class two received SDI. Sixteen weeks later \nat the end of the course, the two classes took a post-test on consecutive interpreting skills \nand completed a post-self-assessment to rate their competence in the same eleven learning \nobjectives. After controlling the effects of pre-test and pre-self-assessment scores, ANCOVA \nresults suggested that VDI and SDI are equally effective in teaching CI to undergraduates, \nexcept for one aspect that the latter is more effective in cultivating students’ ability to use \nnon-verbal elements. Pedagogical implications about the complementary nature of the two \napproaches were discussed.","PeriodicalId":387207,"journal":{"name":"Onomázein Revista de lingüística filología y traducción","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onomázein Revista de lingüística filología y traducción","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7764/ONOMAZEIN.44.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Video dominated instruction (VDI) and simulation dominated instruction (SDI) are commonly practised in interpreter training, and yet their teaching effects have not been adequately researched so far. The present study was intended to compare the effectiveness
of the two instructional approaches in teaching consecutive interpreting (CI) to third-year
undergraduates. A quasi-experimental two-group pre-test/post-test comparison design was
used. Sixty-two students took a pre-test on consecutive interpreting skills and completed
a pre-self-assessment to rate their competence in eleven learning objectives at the beginning of a consecutive interpreting course. Thirty-one students in class one as the comparison
group received VDI, while thirty-one students in class two received SDI. Sixteen weeks later
at the end of the course, the two classes took a post-test on consecutive interpreting skills
and completed a post-self-assessment to rate their competence in the same eleven learning
objectives. After controlling the effects of pre-test and pre-self-assessment scores, ANCOVA
results suggested that VDI and SDI are equally effective in teaching CI to undergraduates,
except for one aspect that the latter is more effective in cultivating students’ ability to use
non-verbal elements. Pedagogical implications about the complementary nature of the two
approaches were discussed.