{"title":"Religious Plurality in the Madiun Residency After the Administrative Modernization of the 20th Century","authors":"Mochammad Nginwanun Likullil Mahamid","doi":"10.30829/juspi.v6i1.11546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to answer the question of how indigenous officials in the Madiun Residency responded to the attitude of the Dutch East Indies Government which was anti to religious issues, given its position as part of the administrative area of the Dutch East Indies Government formed after the Java War (1825-1830), in addition to controlling the colonies, there were also efforts to separate religion and government, thus making indigenous peoples struggled in carrying out their worship and religious activities until the end of the 19th century. Using historical methods and approaches to the sociology of religion, as well as reinforced by the Challenge and Response theory, which was initiated by Arnold Joseph Tonybee, the findings show that there was interference from the priyayi elite and peasants who urged the Dutch government to issue a policy of administrative modernization in the 20th century, which provided an opportunity for indigenous officials to hold certain posts in the government, then the native officials responded again dengan gave a kind of flexibility in carrying out religious activities for every religious believer.","PeriodicalId":443274,"journal":{"name":"JUSPI (Jurnal Sejarah Peradaban Islam)","volume":"16 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JUSPI (Jurnal Sejarah Peradaban Islam)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30829/juspi.v6i1.11546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article aims to answer the question of how indigenous officials in the Madiun Residency responded to the attitude of the Dutch East Indies Government which was anti to religious issues, given its position as part of the administrative area of the Dutch East Indies Government formed after the Java War (1825-1830), in addition to controlling the colonies, there were also efforts to separate religion and government, thus making indigenous peoples struggled in carrying out their worship and religious activities until the end of the 19th century. Using historical methods and approaches to the sociology of religion, as well as reinforced by the Challenge and Response theory, which was initiated by Arnold Joseph Tonybee, the findings show that there was interference from the priyayi elite and peasants who urged the Dutch government to issue a policy of administrative modernization in the 20th century, which provided an opportunity for indigenous officials to hold certain posts in the government, then the native officials responded again dengan gave a kind of flexibility in carrying out religious activities for every religious believer.
本文旨在回答Madiun居住地的土著官员如何回应荷兰东印度政府反对宗教问题的态度,鉴于其作为爪哇战争(1825-1830)后成立的荷兰东印度政府行政区域的一部分,除了控制殖民地外,还有将宗教和政府分开的努力。这使得土著人民在进行他们的崇拜和宗教活动方面一直挣扎到19世纪末。运用宗教社会学的历史方法和方法,并辅以阿诺德·约瑟夫·汤尼比(Arnold Joseph Tonybee)提出的挑战与回应理论(Challenge and Response theory),研究结果表明,在20世纪,普里亚伊(priyayi)精英和农民敦促荷兰政府颁布行政现代化政策,对荷兰的行政现代化进行了干预。这为土著官员在政府中担任一定的职位提供了机会,然后,土著官员再次做出回应,登干给予了每一个信教的人进行宗教活动的灵活性。