Evaluation of Effect of Diameter of Saphenous Vein on Stump Length after Radiofrequency Ablation for Varicose Vein

A. Essawy, H. Kamal, Taha Abdelsalam, A. Abdelhamed
{"title":"Evaluation of Effect of Diameter of Saphenous Vein on Stump Length after Radiofrequency Ablation for Varicose Vein","authors":"A. Essawy, H. Kamal, Taha Abdelsalam, A. Abdelhamed","doi":"10.21608/fumj.2020.114332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There have been tremendous changes to the treatment of varicose veins over the years. High ligation of the SFJ and stripping of the GSV have been considered as standard treatments for GSV insufficiency for more than one century and it is still adopted as the preferred method in the majority of the surgical centers. However, the increase in minimally invasive treatments such as EVLA, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy and cryostripping have given excellent results. Most patients undergoing these minimal invasive treatments were satisfied with their results. Objective: To evaluate the effect of diameter of great saphenous vein on stump length after radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins. Methods: In this study we have followed 30 cases underwent RFA and we can say that the results were quite satisfying. After the RF ablation, no major complications occurred (recurrence, recanalization) at the time of the study, minor complications however, were quite common and included bruising /ecchymosis, postoperative pain that required analgesics, superficial thrombophlebitis that was very responsive to medical treatment. Results: Radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins with recently used ClosureFastTM (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) catheter showed that there is no correlation between preoperative diameter of GSV and postoperative length of its stump. Therefore, RFA is continuing to be an outstanding minimal invasive method for treatment of varicose veins with minimal complications and a very short recovery period disregarding the vein diameter which sounds appealing to the patients. ISSN: 2536-9474 (Print) Original article / FYMJ ISSN: 2536-9482 (Online) Fayoum University Medical Journal Abdelhamed et al., 2020,6(1), 75-83 Page 76 Conclusion: The diameter of the saphenous vein has no correlation with the length of stump after RFA. As long as ClosureFastTM (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) catheter was used for ablation with its tip placed 2cm distal to SFJ, under locally injected Tumescent anaethesia.","PeriodicalId":436341,"journal":{"name":"Fayoum University Medical Journal","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fayoum University Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/fumj.2020.114332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There have been tremendous changes to the treatment of varicose veins over the years. High ligation of the SFJ and stripping of the GSV have been considered as standard treatments for GSV insufficiency for more than one century and it is still adopted as the preferred method in the majority of the surgical centers. However, the increase in minimally invasive treatments such as EVLA, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy and cryostripping have given excellent results. Most patients undergoing these minimal invasive treatments were satisfied with their results. Objective: To evaluate the effect of diameter of great saphenous vein on stump length after radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins. Methods: In this study we have followed 30 cases underwent RFA and we can say that the results were quite satisfying. After the RF ablation, no major complications occurred (recurrence, recanalization) at the time of the study, minor complications however, were quite common and included bruising /ecchymosis, postoperative pain that required analgesics, superficial thrombophlebitis that was very responsive to medical treatment. Results: Radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins with recently used ClosureFastTM (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) catheter showed that there is no correlation between preoperative diameter of GSV and postoperative length of its stump. Therefore, RFA is continuing to be an outstanding minimal invasive method for treatment of varicose veins with minimal complications and a very short recovery period disregarding the vein diameter which sounds appealing to the patients. ISSN: 2536-9474 (Print) Original article / FYMJ ISSN: 2536-9482 (Online) Fayoum University Medical Journal Abdelhamed et al., 2020,6(1), 75-83 Page 76 Conclusion: The diameter of the saphenous vein has no correlation with the length of stump after RFA. As long as ClosureFastTM (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) catheter was used for ablation with its tip placed 2cm distal to SFJ, under locally injected Tumescent anaethesia.
静脉曲张射频消融后隐静脉直径对残端长度影响的评价
背景:多年来,静脉曲张的治疗已经发生了巨大的变化。一个多世纪以来,SFJ高位结扎和GSV剥离一直被认为是GSV功能不全的标准治疗方法,目前仍被大多数外科中心采用为首选方法。然而,微创治疗的增加,如EVLA,射频消融术(RFA),超声引导泡沫硬化治疗和冷冻剥离已经取得了很好的效果。大多数接受微创治疗的患者对其结果感到满意。目的:探讨静脉曲张射频消融后大隐静脉直径对残端长度的影响。方法:本研究对30例RFA患者进行随访,结果令人满意。射频消融后,在研究期间没有发生重大并发症(复发、再通),然而,轻微并发症很常见,包括瘀伤/瘀斑、需要镇痛的术后疼痛、对药物治疗非常敏感的浅表血栓性静脉炎。结果:最近使用的ClosureFastTM (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA)导管射频消融静脉曲张显示术前GSV直径与术后残端长度无相关性。因此,RFA仍然是治疗静脉曲张的一种出色的微创方法,并发症少,恢复期短,不考虑静脉直径,这听起来对患者很有吸引力。法youm大学医学杂志Abdelhamed et al., 2020,6(1), 75-83 Page 76结论:RFA后隐静脉直径与残端长度无相关性。只要使用ClosureFastTM (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA)导管,其尖端放置在SFJ远端2cm处,在局部注射肿胀麻醉下进行消融。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信