Deembeding of the Taper-fed CPW and Microstrip Lines Characteristic Impedance with Probe-tip Calibrations

J. Grzyb, G. Tröster
{"title":"Deembeding of the Taper-fed CPW and Microstrip Lines Characteristic Impedance with Probe-tip Calibrations","authors":"J. Grzyb, G. Tröster","doi":"10.1109/SPI.2002.258288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A procedure allowing systematic determination of the characteristic impedance of the taper-fed CPW and microstrip lines and deembedding the influence of the feeding discontinuities is presented. The procedure is based on the measurement technique of two different on-wafer line standards. An initial off-wafer LRM or TRL calibration with standard calibration substrate is assumed. The feeding structure consists of a coplanar pad configuration suited for probe-tip feeding and via-based or taper-based transitions to microstrip or CPW configurations, respectively. The procedure consists of two steps. In the first step the probe–tip discontinuity only is deembedded. For this purpose we use our new chain matrix formulated calibration comparison technique based on the measurements of two on-wafer CPW line standards of the same geometry as the feeding pads. Our onwafer CPW standards stay the same for all measured microstrip lines. This allows to perform only one probe-tip deembeding valid for all of the measured microstrip lines. The second step is deembeding of the CPW-microstrip line or CPW-taper-CPW transition and determination of the characteristic impedance of measured lines. The first novelty is the formulation of the whole extraction problem in terms of the ABCD chain matrix. It allows us to omit one of the limitations of the true traveling waves based S-matrix [3] asymmetry of the general CPW-microstrip line and CPWtaper-CPW transitions. This limitation is a difference between complex characteristic impedances of CPW and microstrip or different CPW lines. On the contrary, the symmetry of its admittance matrix or equivalently the determinant AD-BC of its chain matrix is not influenced by this effect. The next novelty lies in the modeling of these transitions. We assume that it can be approximated by a symmetric model. Its chain matrix fulfills the condition A=D. This, in turn, allows to extract the characteristic impedance of the lines based on two line measurements without using of any fixed transition model. Such a formulation takes automatically into consideration even a distributed nature of the transition, which can be of importance at mm-wave frequencies. The complex propagation constants and characteristic impedance of wide CPW lines on fused silica substrate exceeding the pitch of the probes have been determined from the measurements. We have also analyzed the extraction procedure of different CPWmicrostrip geometries on GaAs and MCM-D substrates up to 70GHz. We have compared different transition models: simple series inductance, cascade of parallel capacitance and series inductance, cascade of series inductance and parallel capacitance and our box model with its chain matrix fulfilling the condition A=D. The latter model outperforms the others, esp. at higher mm-wave frequencies. We have also investigated different topologies of the transition for MCM-D to find the optimum one. The best extraction accuracy can be achieved if the microstrip GND extends under the CPW feeding part. The equivalent model elements are extracted for every frequency point. Thus their frequency behavior can be investigated and the possible validity of the model (constant equivalent element values) proved. I. General Waveguide Theory In the course of the paper reading we will always refer to the definition of S-matrix based on general waveguide theory (mentioned in the abstract), namely true traveling or pseudowaves S-matrix. More detailed information on the definition and properties of these intensities can be found in our second paper, which is to be published in the SPI 2002 proceedings (“ S Matrix versus ABCD Chain Matrix Formulation in the Probe-tip Calibrations“ ) or in [3]. II. Existing methods versus our problem formulation The general two-port measurement problem is shown in Fig.1. Losses and phase delays caused by the connectors, cables, transitions and switching as well as isolation errors of the VNA have been accounted for by the initial off-wafer calibration. Also probe-tip discontinuities have already been deembedded in the first step of the procedure in a way described in the abstract. Hence the error boxes on both sides of the DUT represent CPW-microstrip line or CPW-taperCPW transition and are equal. Such that only error box denoted as RA is to be determined (measurement problem is symmetric).","PeriodicalId":290013,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings: 6th IEEE Workshop on Signal Propagation on Interconnects","volume":"251 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings: 6th IEEE Workshop on Signal Propagation on Interconnects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPI.2002.258288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A procedure allowing systematic determination of the characteristic impedance of the taper-fed CPW and microstrip lines and deembedding the influence of the feeding discontinuities is presented. The procedure is based on the measurement technique of two different on-wafer line standards. An initial off-wafer LRM or TRL calibration with standard calibration substrate is assumed. The feeding structure consists of a coplanar pad configuration suited for probe-tip feeding and via-based or taper-based transitions to microstrip or CPW configurations, respectively. The procedure consists of two steps. In the first step the probe–tip discontinuity only is deembedded. For this purpose we use our new chain matrix formulated calibration comparison technique based on the measurements of two on-wafer CPW line standards of the same geometry as the feeding pads. Our onwafer CPW standards stay the same for all measured microstrip lines. This allows to perform only one probe-tip deembeding valid for all of the measured microstrip lines. The second step is deembeding of the CPW-microstrip line or CPW-taper-CPW transition and determination of the characteristic impedance of measured lines. The first novelty is the formulation of the whole extraction problem in terms of the ABCD chain matrix. It allows us to omit one of the limitations of the true traveling waves based S-matrix [3] asymmetry of the general CPW-microstrip line and CPWtaper-CPW transitions. This limitation is a difference between complex characteristic impedances of CPW and microstrip or different CPW lines. On the contrary, the symmetry of its admittance matrix or equivalently the determinant AD-BC of its chain matrix is not influenced by this effect. The next novelty lies in the modeling of these transitions. We assume that it can be approximated by a symmetric model. Its chain matrix fulfills the condition A=D. This, in turn, allows to extract the characteristic impedance of the lines based on two line measurements without using of any fixed transition model. Such a formulation takes automatically into consideration even a distributed nature of the transition, which can be of importance at mm-wave frequencies. The complex propagation constants and characteristic impedance of wide CPW lines on fused silica substrate exceeding the pitch of the probes have been determined from the measurements. We have also analyzed the extraction procedure of different CPWmicrostrip geometries on GaAs and MCM-D substrates up to 70GHz. We have compared different transition models: simple series inductance, cascade of parallel capacitance and series inductance, cascade of series inductance and parallel capacitance and our box model with its chain matrix fulfilling the condition A=D. The latter model outperforms the others, esp. at higher mm-wave frequencies. We have also investigated different topologies of the transition for MCM-D to find the optimum one. The best extraction accuracy can be achieved if the microstrip GND extends under the CPW feeding part. The equivalent model elements are extracted for every frequency point. Thus their frequency behavior can be investigated and the possible validity of the model (constant equivalent element values) proved. I. General Waveguide Theory In the course of the paper reading we will always refer to the definition of S-matrix based on general waveguide theory (mentioned in the abstract), namely true traveling or pseudowaves S-matrix. More detailed information on the definition and properties of these intensities can be found in our second paper, which is to be published in the SPI 2002 proceedings (“ S Matrix versus ABCD Chain Matrix Formulation in the Probe-tip Calibrations“ ) or in [3]. II. Existing methods versus our problem formulation The general two-port measurement problem is shown in Fig.1. Losses and phase delays caused by the connectors, cables, transitions and switching as well as isolation errors of the VNA have been accounted for by the initial off-wafer calibration. Also probe-tip discontinuities have already been deembedded in the first step of the procedure in a way described in the abstract. Hence the error boxes on both sides of the DUT represent CPW-microstrip line or CPW-taperCPW transition and are equal. Such that only error box denoted as RA is to be determined (measurement problem is symmetric).
锥形馈电CPW和微带线特性阻抗的探针尖校准解嵌
提出了一种系统地测定锥形馈电CPW和微带线的特性阻抗并消除馈电不连续性影响的方法。该程序基于两种不同的晶圆线上标准的测量技术。假设使用标准校准基板进行初始的晶圆外LRM或TRL校准。进料结构包括一个共面衬垫结构,分别适用于探针尖进料和基于过孔或锥形过渡到微带或CPW结构。这个过程包括两个步骤。在第一步中,只去除探针尖端的不连续。为此,我们采用新的链矩阵公式校准比较技术,该技术基于与进料垫相同几何形状的两个晶圆上CPW线标准的测量。对于所有测量的微带线,我们的onwafer CPW标准保持不变。这允许对所有测量的微带线只执行一个有效的探针尖端解嵌入。第二步是对cpw微带线或cpw -锥形- cpw过渡线进行解嵌入,并确定被测线的特性阻抗。第一个新颖之处是用ABCD链矩阵来表示整个提取问题。它允许我们忽略基于s矩阵[3]的真正行波的限制之一,一般cpw微带线和cpw -锥- cpw过渡的不对称性。这种限制是CPW和微带或不同的CPW线的复杂特性阻抗之间的差异。相反,其导纳矩阵的对称性或其链矩阵的行列式AD-BC不受这种效应的影响。下一个新奇之处在于这些转换的建模。我们假设它可以用一个对称模型来近似。它的链式矩阵满足条件A=D。这反过来又允许在不使用任何固定过渡模型的情况下,根据两条线的测量结果提取线路的特性阻抗。这样的公式会自动考虑到过渡的分布式性质,这在毫米波频率上是很重要的。通过测量,确定了超过探针节距的熔融石英衬底上宽CPW线的复传播常数和特性阻抗。我们还分析了在高达70GHz的GaAs和MCM-D衬底上不同cpw微带几何形状的提取过程。我们比较了简单的串联电感、并联电容与串联电感的级联、串联电感与并联电容的级联以及链矩阵满足条件A=D的箱型模型。后一种模型的性能优于其他模型,特别是在更高的毫米波频率下。我们还研究了MCM-D转换的不同拓扑结构,以找到最优的拓扑结构。当微带GND延伸到CPW进料部分下方时,可获得最佳的提取精度。对每个频率点提取等效模型元。从而可以研究它们的频率特性,并证明模型(常等效单元值)的可能有效性。在阅读论文的过程中,我们总是会提到基于一般波导理论的s矩阵的定义(摘要中提到),即真行波s矩阵或伪波s矩阵。关于这些强度的定义和性质的更详细信息可以在我们的第二篇论文中找到,这篇论文将发表在SPI 2002论文集(“探针尖端校准中的S矩阵与ABCD链矩阵公式”)或[3]中。2一般的双端口测量问题如图1所示。由连接器、电缆、转换和开关以及VNA的隔离误差引起的损耗和相位延迟已经在初始的晶圆外校准中得到了考虑。此外,探针尖端不连续已经在程序的第一步中以摘要中描述的方式去嵌入。因此,DUT两侧的错误框表示cpw -微带线或cpw -锥形cpw转换,并且相等。这样,只需要确定用RA表示的误差框(测量问题是对称的)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信