Applying Sentiment Analysis, Topic Modeling, and XGBoost to Classify Implied Volatility

Farshid Balaneji, D. Maringer
{"title":"Applying Sentiment Analysis, Topic Modeling, and XGBoost to Classify Implied Volatility","authors":"Farshid Balaneji, D. Maringer","doi":"10.1109/CIFEr52523.2022.9776196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Implied volatility is an important indicator that shows the market participants’ expectations about the future fluctuations in the options market. This paper evaluates the question of whether the combination of topics and sentiment scores extracted from mainstream financial news could improve forecasting the directional changes of the expected implied volatility index in the next month (iv30call). We select six stocks from the Dow Jones list of companies and acquire over 190,000 news published between January 2019 and September 2019. By building text processing and topic modeling pipelines, we can examine (i) the role of daily mean and medium of sentiment scores; and (ii) the influence of topic models on the classification metrics. The results demonstrate that adding a topic model has a positive effect on the model’s accuracy, which reaches higher accuracy in classifying the iv30call of the next business day in five out of six companies. The outcome suggests that applying the mean of the daily sentiment scores improves the models’ accuracy compared to the daily median for the selected assets.","PeriodicalId":234473,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering and Economics (CIFEr)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering and Economics (CIFEr)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIFEr52523.2022.9776196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implied volatility is an important indicator that shows the market participants’ expectations about the future fluctuations in the options market. This paper evaluates the question of whether the combination of topics and sentiment scores extracted from mainstream financial news could improve forecasting the directional changes of the expected implied volatility index in the next month (iv30call). We select six stocks from the Dow Jones list of companies and acquire over 190,000 news published between January 2019 and September 2019. By building text processing and topic modeling pipelines, we can examine (i) the role of daily mean and medium of sentiment scores; and (ii) the influence of topic models on the classification metrics. The results demonstrate that adding a topic model has a positive effect on the model’s accuracy, which reaches higher accuracy in classifying the iv30call of the next business day in five out of six companies. The outcome suggests that applying the mean of the daily sentiment scores improves the models’ accuracy compared to the daily median for the selected assets.
应用情感分析、主题建模和XGBoost对隐含波动率进行分类
隐含波动率是反映市场参与者对期权市场未来波动预期的重要指标。本文评估了从主流财经新闻中提取的主题和情绪得分的组合是否可以改善对下个月预期隐含波动率指数(iv30call)方向变化的预测。我们从道琼斯公司名单中选择了6只股票,并收购了2019年1月至2019年9月期间发布的190,000多条新闻。通过构建文本处理和主题建模管道,我们可以检验(i)情绪得分的日均值和中间值的作用;(ii)主题模型对分类指标的影响。结果表明,增加主题模型对模型的准确率有积极的影响,6家公司中有5家对下一个营业日的iv30电话进行了更高的分类准确率。结果表明,与所选资产的每日中位数相比,应用每日情绪得分的平均值可以提高模型的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信