The General Strike of July 1919

Jacopo Perazzoli
{"title":"The General Strike of July 1919","authors":"Jacopo Perazzoli","doi":"10.3828/liverpool/9781800857193.003.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wilson's and Lenin's internationalism, two supranational approaches that emerged during and following World War I, had a large influence on the European socialist and social-democratic parties that were once members of the Second International. In line with this statement, which has been widely accepted by historians, this chapter aims to suggest a new interpretative key: it attempts to explain how Wilsonian and Leninist influences were actually present within Italian Socialism (to the point of coexisting in certain cases).\nIn order to explore such thesis, which on a historiographic level is destined to reconsider the traditional interpretation of “Wilson versus Lenin” and to ensure both a comparative and transnational approach, the chapter will analyse the general strike of July 1919 and the positions within the Italian Left. On that occasion, in fact, socialist and communist militants took to the streets in support of Russian and Hungarian communists and against the armed intervention of the “white” forces in that area. Given this approach, the chapter will understand to what extent the two models, although pursuing different objectives, managed to coexist, thus representing two distinct responses to the crisis of the traditional nation-state.\nBased on an extensive scrutinizing of primary sources, this chapter will show a specific purpose: launching a new historiographical reinterpretation able to analyse the two models not as opposed to each other but considering them, in some cases, as co-existing. That is precisely because they were a product of the Great War and because both Wilsonianism and Leninism aimed to avoid new war escalations similar to World War I.","PeriodicalId":244721,"journal":{"name":"The Global Challenge of Peace","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Global Challenge of Peace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781800857193.003.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wilson's and Lenin's internationalism, two supranational approaches that emerged during and following World War I, had a large influence on the European socialist and social-democratic parties that were once members of the Second International. In line with this statement, which has been widely accepted by historians, this chapter aims to suggest a new interpretative key: it attempts to explain how Wilsonian and Leninist influences were actually present within Italian Socialism (to the point of coexisting in certain cases). In order to explore such thesis, which on a historiographic level is destined to reconsider the traditional interpretation of “Wilson versus Lenin” and to ensure both a comparative and transnational approach, the chapter will analyse the general strike of July 1919 and the positions within the Italian Left. On that occasion, in fact, socialist and communist militants took to the streets in support of Russian and Hungarian communists and against the armed intervention of the “white” forces in that area. Given this approach, the chapter will understand to what extent the two models, although pursuing different objectives, managed to coexist, thus representing two distinct responses to the crisis of the traditional nation-state. Based on an extensive scrutinizing of primary sources, this chapter will show a specific purpose: launching a new historiographical reinterpretation able to analyse the two models not as opposed to each other but considering them, in some cases, as co-existing. That is precisely because they were a product of the Great War and because both Wilsonianism and Leninism aimed to avoid new war escalations similar to World War I.
1919年7月的总罢工
威尔逊和列宁的国际主义是在第一次世界大战期间和之后出现的两种超国家的国际主义,对曾经是第二国际成员的欧洲社会主义和社会民主党产生了重大影响。根据这一被历史学家广泛接受的说法,本章旨在提出一个新的解释关键:它试图解释威尔逊和列宁主义的影响是如何在意大利社会主义中实际存在的(在某些情况下达到共存的程度)。为了探讨这一在史学层面上注定要重新考虑“威尔逊对列宁”的传统解释的论文,并确保采用比较和跨国的方法,本章将分析1919年7月的总罢工和意大利左翼内部的立场。事实上,当时社会主义和共产主义武装分子走上街头,支持俄罗斯和匈牙利共产党人,反对“白人”部队在该地区的武装干预。基于这种方法,本章将理解这两种模式,尽管追求不同的目标,但在多大程度上能够共存,从而代表了对传统民族国家危机的两种截然不同的反应。基于对原始资料的广泛审查,本章将显示一个特定的目的:发起一种新的史学重新解释,可以分析这两种模式,而不是相互对立,而是在某些情况下将它们视为共存的。这恰恰是因为它们是第一次世界大战的产物,因为威尔逊主义和列宁主义都旨在避免类似第一次世界大战那样的新的战争升级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信