To be Heard through the #MeToo backlash

Sabrina Moro, G. Sapio, Charlotte Buisson, Noémie Trovato, Zoé Duchamp
{"title":"To be Heard through the #MeToo backlash","authors":"Sabrina Moro, G. Sapio, Charlotte Buisson, Noémie Trovato, Zoé Duchamp","doi":"10.3898/soun.83.06.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard defamation trial constitutes what Sarah Banet-Weiser (2018) calls a 'feminist flashpoint': it has become a media event that facilitates and shapes discourses around gender-based violence in the public sphere. The cultural significance of the social media commentaries on the trial is threefold. First, the sheer volume of media traffic turns sexual violence into a media spectacle. Second, commentary featured discussion of domestic violence and situated it within the legacies of #MeToo. Thirdly, the stark divide between Depp and Heard supporters reveals shifts in cultural understandings of sexual violence since #MeToo but also a backlash against the movement. Cultural understandings of gender-based violence and feminism, popularised by #MeToo, are acknowledged, but the same digital tools that enable online feminist activism are mobilised in the backlash. The authors explore the re-activation of the myth of the 'ideal victim'; Heard's resistance to dominant representations of the passive victim; and the 'memeification' of Heard (Valenti 2022) as a form of gendered surveillance and policing. The trial exemplifies a new iteration of postfeminism, one that acknowledges the cultural and political significance of #MeToo yet upholds the same rape myths that were previously criticised.","PeriodicalId":403400,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/soun.83.06.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard defamation trial constitutes what Sarah Banet-Weiser (2018) calls a 'feminist flashpoint': it has become a media event that facilitates and shapes discourses around gender-based violence in the public sphere. The cultural significance of the social media commentaries on the trial is threefold. First, the sheer volume of media traffic turns sexual violence into a media spectacle. Second, commentary featured discussion of domestic violence and situated it within the legacies of #MeToo. Thirdly, the stark divide between Depp and Heard supporters reveals shifts in cultural understandings of sexual violence since #MeToo but also a backlash against the movement. Cultural understandings of gender-based violence and feminism, popularised by #MeToo, are acknowledged, but the same digital tools that enable online feminist activism are mobilised in the backlash. The authors explore the re-activation of the myth of the 'ideal victim'; Heard's resistance to dominant representations of the passive victim; and the 'memeification' of Heard (Valenti 2022) as a form of gendered surveillance and policing. The trial exemplifies a new iteration of postfeminism, one that acknowledges the cultural and political significance of #MeToo yet upholds the same rape myths that were previously criticised.
在#MeToo运动中被听到
摘要:约翰尼·德普诉艾梅柏·希尔德诽谤案构成了莎拉·班内特-威瑟(2018)所说的“女权主义爆发点”:它已经成为一个媒体事件,促进和塑造了公共领域关于性别暴力的话语。社交媒体对审判的评论具有三方面的文化意义。首先,媒体流量的巨大数量使性暴力成为媒体的奇观。其次,评论以讨论家庭暴力为特色,并将其置于#MeToo运动的遗产之中。第三,德普和希尔德的支持者之间的明显分歧表明,自#MeToo运动以来,文化对性暴力的理解发生了变化,但也反映出对该运动的强烈反对。由#MeToo推广的对性别暴力和女权主义的文化理解得到了承认,但在这种反弹中,同样的数字工具也被动员起来,这些工具使在线女权主义活动成为可能。作者探讨了“理想受害者”神话的再激活;希尔德对被动受害者的主导表征的反抗;以及对赫德的“模因化”(Valenti 2022),将其视为一种性别监视和警务形式。这场审判体现了后女权主义的新迭代,它承认#MeToo的文化和政治意义,但却坚持之前受到批评的强奸神话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信