Distracted Investors under Institutional Cross-Blockholding: Evidence from Corporate Social Responsibility

Tao Chen, Jimmy Chengyuan Qu
{"title":"Distracted Investors under Institutional Cross-Blockholding: Evidence from Corporate Social Responsibility","authors":"Tao Chen, Jimmy Chengyuan Qu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3714094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper documents a negative effect of institutional cross-blockholding on portfolio firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance. Our baseline results show that cross-held firms perform worse in CSR than non-cross-held firms do. A quasi-natural experiment based on mergers between institutional blockholders is applied to establish the causality. Evidence from EDGAR search volume and shareholder proposals on socially responsible investment suggests that the negative impact of institutional cross-blockholding on CSR mainly comes from investor distraction when investors hold multiple blocks simultaneously. By highlighting the social cost of institutional cross-blockholding, this paper finds a distraction effect of institutional cross-ownership, which extends our understanding of this unique ownership structure.","PeriodicalId":105736,"journal":{"name":"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3714094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper documents a negative effect of institutional cross-blockholding on portfolio firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance. Our baseline results show that cross-held firms perform worse in CSR than non-cross-held firms do. A quasi-natural experiment based on mergers between institutional blockholders is applied to establish the causality. Evidence from EDGAR search volume and shareholder proposals on socially responsible investment suggests that the negative impact of institutional cross-blockholding on CSR mainly comes from investor distraction when investors hold multiple blocks simultaneously. By highlighting the social cost of institutional cross-blockholding, this paper finds a distraction effect of institutional cross-ownership, which extends our understanding of this unique ownership structure.
机构交叉持股下的分散投资者:来自企业社会责任的证据
本文研究了机构交叉持股对被投资企业社会责任绩效的负向影响。我们的基线结果表明,交叉持股公司在企业社会责任方面的表现比非交叉持股公司更差。采用基于机构股东合并的准自然实验来确定二者之间的因果关系。EDGAR搜索量和股东对社会责任投资建议的证据表明,机构交叉持股对企业社会责任的负面影响主要来自投资者同时持有多个股权时的分散。本文通过突出机构交叉持股的社会成本,发现了机构交叉持股的分散效应,拓展了我们对这种独特股权结构的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信