Exploring the process of becoming and working as a practice development unit.

L. Bray, Jeremy M. Brown, T. Prescott, C. Moen
{"title":"Exploring the process of becoming and working as a practice development unit.","authors":"L. Bray, Jeremy M. Brown, T. Prescott, C. Moen","doi":"10.1002/PDH.294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to explore the perspective of multidisciplinary staff on the process of becoming and working as a practice development unit (PDU). PDUs are reported as positive initiatives within health care. It is important to understand the process of becoming a PDU and the ongoing effects of the process to the staff working within the unit. This project engaged with multidisciplinary staff working on six PDU units throughout the north-west of England. Data collection was in two phases: a self-completion questionnaire distributed to all staff within the PDUs (n = 625, 28.2% response rate) followed by 17 semi-structured telephone interviews. The majority of questionnaire respondents (n = 114, 64%) indicated that they would recommend PDU accreditation to other units. The main themes arising from the project focus on accreditation having a positive influence on multidisciplinary team working, evidence-based practice and improving opportunities for professional development. Issues were raised during the interviews regarding the increased development of staff leading to high turnover, the high workload involved in leading the accreditation and the inequitable involvement of professions in the process. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":322010,"journal":{"name":"Practice Development in Health Care","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practice Development in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/PDH.294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the perspective of multidisciplinary staff on the process of becoming and working as a practice development unit (PDU). PDUs are reported as positive initiatives within health care. It is important to understand the process of becoming a PDU and the ongoing effects of the process to the staff working within the unit. This project engaged with multidisciplinary staff working on six PDU units throughout the north-west of England. Data collection was in two phases: a self-completion questionnaire distributed to all staff within the PDUs (n = 625, 28.2% response rate) followed by 17 semi-structured telephone interviews. The majority of questionnaire respondents (n = 114, 64%) indicated that they would recommend PDU accreditation to other units. The main themes arising from the project focus on accreditation having a positive influence on multidisciplinary team working, evidence-based practice and improving opportunities for professional development. Issues were raised during the interviews regarding the increased development of staff leading to high turnover, the high workload involved in leading the accreditation and the inequitable involvement of professions in the process. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
探索作为实践发展单位的形成和工作过程。
本研究旨在探讨多学科工作人员在成为实践发展单位(PDU)的过程中的观点。据报告,pdu是医疗保健领域的积极举措。了解成为PDU的过程以及该过程对在单位内工作的员工的持续影响是很重要的。该项目涉及在英格兰西北部的六个PDU单元工作的多学科工作人员。数据收集分为两个阶段:向公共部门内的所有工作人员分发一份自填问卷(n = 625,回复率28.2%),然后进行17次半结构化电话访谈。大多数问卷调查对象(n = 114,64%)表示他们会向其他单位推荐PDU认证。项目产生的主要主题侧重于认证对多学科团队工作、循证实践和改善专业发展机会的积极影响。在面谈中提出了一些问题,包括工作人员发展增加导致高流动率、主持认证工作的工作量大以及专业人员不公平地参与这一过程。版权所有©2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信