Ecological Foundations for Fire Management in North American Forest and Shrubland Ecosystems

J. Keeley, G. Aplet, N. Christensen, S. Conard, E. A. Johnson, P. Omi, D. Peterson, T. Swetnam
{"title":"Ecological Foundations for Fire Management in North American Forest and Shrubland Ecosystems","authors":"J. Keeley, G. Aplet, N. Christensen, S. Conard, E. A. Johnson, P. Omi, D. Peterson, T. Swetnam","doi":"10.2737/PNW-GTR-779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This synthesis provides an ecological foundation for management of the diverse ecosystems and fire regimes of North America, based on scientific principles of fire interactions with vegetation, fuels, and biophysical processes. Although a large amount of scientific data on fire exists, most of those data have been collected at small spatial and temporal scales. Thus, it is challenging to develop consistent science-based plans for large spatial and temporal scales where most fire management and planning occur. Understanding the regional geographic context of fire regimes is critical for developing appropriate and sustainable management strategies and policy. The degree to which human intervention has modified fire frequency, intensity, and severity varies greatly among different ecosystems, and must be considered when planning to alter fuel loads or implement restorative treatments. Detailed discussion of six ecosystems—ponderosa pine forest (western North America), chaparral (California), boreal forest (Alaska and Canada), Great Basin sagebrush (intermountain West), pine and pine-hardwood forests (Southern Appalachian Mountains), and longleaf pine (Southeastern United States)— illustrates the complexity of fire regimes and that fire management requires a clear regional focus that recognizes where conflicts might exist between fire hazard reduction and resource needs. In some systems, such as ponderosa pine, treatments are usually compatible with both fuel reduction and resource needs, whereas in others, such as chaparral, the potential exists for conflicts that need to be closely evaluated. Managing fire regimes in a changing climate and social environment requires a strong scientific basis for developing fire management and policy.","PeriodicalId":282363,"journal":{"name":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"103","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 103

Abstract

This synthesis provides an ecological foundation for management of the diverse ecosystems and fire regimes of North America, based on scientific principles of fire interactions with vegetation, fuels, and biophysical processes. Although a large amount of scientific data on fire exists, most of those data have been collected at small spatial and temporal scales. Thus, it is challenging to develop consistent science-based plans for large spatial and temporal scales where most fire management and planning occur. Understanding the regional geographic context of fire regimes is critical for developing appropriate and sustainable management strategies and policy. The degree to which human intervention has modified fire frequency, intensity, and severity varies greatly among different ecosystems, and must be considered when planning to alter fuel loads or implement restorative treatments. Detailed discussion of six ecosystems—ponderosa pine forest (western North America), chaparral (California), boreal forest (Alaska and Canada), Great Basin sagebrush (intermountain West), pine and pine-hardwood forests (Southern Appalachian Mountains), and longleaf pine (Southeastern United States)— illustrates the complexity of fire regimes and that fire management requires a clear regional focus that recognizes where conflicts might exist between fire hazard reduction and resource needs. In some systems, such as ponderosa pine, treatments are usually compatible with both fuel reduction and resource needs, whereas in others, such as chaparral, the potential exists for conflicts that need to be closely evaluated. Managing fire regimes in a changing climate and social environment requires a strong scientific basis for developing fire management and policy.
北美森林和灌丛生态系统火灾管理的生态学基础
基于火灾与植被、燃料和生物物理过程相互作用的科学原理,这种综合为管理北美不同的生态系统和火灾制度提供了生态基础。虽然有大量关于火灾的科学数据,但这些数据大多是在小的空间和时间尺度上收集的。因此,在火灾管理和规划发生的大空间和时间尺度上,制定一致的科学规划是一项挑战。了解火灾制度的区域地理环境对于制定适当和可持续的管理战略和政策至关重要。人为干预对火灾频率、强度和严重程度的影响程度在不同的生态系统之间差异很大,在计划改变燃料负荷或实施恢复性处理时必须考虑到这一点。对六个生态系统——黄松林(北美西部)、灌木林(加利福尼亚)、北方森林(阿拉斯加和加拿大)、大盆地山艾树(西部山间)、松树和松木硬木林(南阿巴拉契亚山脉)和长叶松(美国东南部)——的详细讨论说明了火灾制度的复杂性,火灾管理需要明确的区域重点,认识到减少火灾危险和资源需求之间可能存在冲突的地方。在一些系统中,如黄松,处理通常既能减少燃料又能满足资源需求,而在其他系统中,如灌木林,则存在冲突的可能性,需要密切评估。在不断变化的气候和社会环境中管理消防制度需要强有力的科学基础来制定消防管理和政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信