The gendered nature of Muslim and Christian stereotypes in the United States

Caroline A. Erentzen, Veronica N. Z. Bergstrom, Norman Zeng, A. Chasteen
{"title":"The gendered nature of Muslim and Christian stereotypes in the United States","authors":"Caroline A. Erentzen, Veronica N. Z. Bergstrom, Norman Zeng, A. Chasteen","doi":"10.1177/13684302221138036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the increasing diversity of religious affiliations in the United States, little research has explored the nature and structure of religious stereotypes of Muslims in America. The present research explores the gendered dimensions of stereotypes of both Muslims and Christians, using a multimethod approach. In Study 1, participants engaged in visual representations of intersectional and superordinate identities using Venn diagrams and slider tasks. Study 2 elicited open trait listings for religious, gender, and intersectional groups, with the most common traits reported for each group. In a conceptual replication, Study 3 asked participants to rate each group for the applicability of the most common traits identified in Study 2. Across the three studies, we found clear and consistent support for intersectionality effects. Unique stereotypic traits were identified for each intersectional group that were not present in either religious or gender superordinate identity. Stereotypes of Christians as a superordinate group contained a balanced representation of Christian men and Christian women traits. In contrast, Muslim stereotypes were strongly influenced by androcentric assumptions, with approximately 80% of the traits ascribed to Muslims overlapping with those of Muslim men. In addition, Muslim women were rated as significantly different from both Muslims and Muslim men on all trait evaluations. This was not observed with Christians, who showed little differentiation by gender. This research provides a rare systematic analysis of the gendered nature of religious stereotypes of Christians and Muslims and contributes to the developing literature on intersectionality and prototypicality.","PeriodicalId":108457,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221138036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Despite the increasing diversity of religious affiliations in the United States, little research has explored the nature and structure of religious stereotypes of Muslims in America. The present research explores the gendered dimensions of stereotypes of both Muslims and Christians, using a multimethod approach. In Study 1, participants engaged in visual representations of intersectional and superordinate identities using Venn diagrams and slider tasks. Study 2 elicited open trait listings for religious, gender, and intersectional groups, with the most common traits reported for each group. In a conceptual replication, Study 3 asked participants to rate each group for the applicability of the most common traits identified in Study 2. Across the three studies, we found clear and consistent support for intersectionality effects. Unique stereotypic traits were identified for each intersectional group that were not present in either religious or gender superordinate identity. Stereotypes of Christians as a superordinate group contained a balanced representation of Christian men and Christian women traits. In contrast, Muslim stereotypes were strongly influenced by androcentric assumptions, with approximately 80% of the traits ascribed to Muslims overlapping with those of Muslim men. In addition, Muslim women were rated as significantly different from both Muslims and Muslim men on all trait evaluations. This was not observed with Christians, who showed little differentiation by gender. This research provides a rare systematic analysis of the gendered nature of religious stereotypes of Christians and Muslims and contributes to the developing literature on intersectionality and prototypicality.
美国穆斯林和基督教刻板印象的性别本质
尽管美国的宗教信仰日益多样化,但很少有研究探讨美国穆斯林宗教刻板印象的性质和结构。目前的研究探讨了穆斯林和基督徒的刻板印象的性别维度,使用多方法的方法。在研究1中,参与者使用维恩图和滑块任务进行交叉身份和上级身份的视觉表征。研究2引出了宗教、性别和交叉群体的公开特征列表,报告了每个群体最常见的特征。在概念复制中,研究3要求参与者对研究2中确定的最常见特征的适用性进行评分。在这三项研究中,我们发现了对交叉效应的明确和一致的支持。在每个交叉群体中发现了独特的刻板印象特征,这些特征在宗教或性别上级身份中都不存在。基督徒作为一个高级群体的刻板印象包含了基督徒男性和基督徒女性特征的平衡代表。相比之下,穆斯林的刻板印象受到男性中心主义假设的强烈影响,大约80%的穆斯林特征与穆斯林男性的特征重叠。此外,穆斯林女性在所有特质评估上都被评为与穆斯林和穆斯林男性有显著差异。这在基督徒身上没有观察到,他们几乎没有表现出性别差异。本研究对基督徒和穆斯林的宗教刻板印象的性别本质进行了罕见的系统分析,并有助于发展有关交叉性和原型性的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信