Oncologic Results of Breast Conserving Surgery under Procedural Sedation in Elderly Patients

Jeeyeon Lee, J. Jung, W. Kim, Y. Lim, Ryu Kyung Lee, K. Kwak, H. Park
{"title":"Oncologic Results of Breast Conserving Surgery under Procedural Sedation in Elderly Patients","authors":"Jeeyeon Lee, J. Jung, W. Kim, Y. Lim, Ryu Kyung Lee, K. Kwak, H. Park","doi":"10.14449/JBD.2019.7.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Although surgery is the most frequently implemented treatment modality for breast cancer, many older patients with breast cancer are underor untreated because of their high incidence of postoperative complications. We assessed the efficacy and safety of breast surgery under procedural sedation in older patients (aged >70 years) by comparing selected clinical and oncologic factors after surgery for breast cancer under general anesthesia versus procedural sedation. Methods: Of 79 older patients with breast cancer, 49 underwent breast-conserving surgery, 30 under general anesthesia and 19 under procedural sedation, and relevant clinical and oncologic variables were compared and analyzed between groups. Results: The mean age was younger in the general anesthesia group and the mean operation time, hospital stay, and fasting time shorter in the procedural sedation group. There were no statistically significant differences in oncologic results between the two groups during follow-up. Conclusion: Breast surgery under procedural sedation is a safe and effective means of reducing tumor burden in older patients with breast cancer when their American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status indicates a high risk of life-threatening perioperative complications associated with general anesthesia. And we also found that the oncologic results may be not inferior to same procedure under general anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":245382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Disease","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14449/JBD.2019.7.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Although surgery is the most frequently implemented treatment modality for breast cancer, many older patients with breast cancer are underor untreated because of their high incidence of postoperative complications. We assessed the efficacy and safety of breast surgery under procedural sedation in older patients (aged >70 years) by comparing selected clinical and oncologic factors after surgery for breast cancer under general anesthesia versus procedural sedation. Methods: Of 79 older patients with breast cancer, 49 underwent breast-conserving surgery, 30 under general anesthesia and 19 under procedural sedation, and relevant clinical and oncologic variables were compared and analyzed between groups. Results: The mean age was younger in the general anesthesia group and the mean operation time, hospital stay, and fasting time shorter in the procedural sedation group. There were no statistically significant differences in oncologic results between the two groups during follow-up. Conclusion: Breast surgery under procedural sedation is a safe and effective means of reducing tumor burden in older patients with breast cancer when their American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status indicates a high risk of life-threatening perioperative complications associated with general anesthesia. And we also found that the oncologic results may be not inferior to same procedure under general anesthesia.
老年患者手术镇静下保乳手术的肿瘤学结果
目的:虽然手术是乳腺癌最常用的治疗方式,但由于术后并发症发生率高,许多老年乳腺癌患者未得到治疗或未得到治疗。我们通过比较全麻和镇静下乳腺癌手术后选定的临床和肿瘤因素来评估老年患者(>70岁)在手术镇静下进行乳房手术的有效性和安全性。方法:79例老年乳腺癌患者中,保乳手术49例,全麻30例,镇静19例,对组间相关临床及肿瘤学指标进行比较分析。结果:全麻组患者平均年龄较轻,程序镇静组患者平均手术时间、住院时间、禁食时间较短。随访期间,两组患者的肿瘤学结果无统计学差异。结论:当美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评定的老年乳腺癌患者全身麻醉围手术期并发症风险较高时,手术镇静是一种安全有效的减轻肿瘤负担的方法。我们还发现,在相同的手术中,在全身麻醉下的肿瘤结果可能并不差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信