Rhetorical relations of contrast in the blog text: marking means, semantics, functions

Inna V. Kovtunenko, Ковтуненко Инна Викторовна
{"title":"Rhetorical relations of contrast in the blog text: marking means, semantics, functions","authors":"Inna V. Kovtunenko, Ковтуненко Инна Викторовна","doi":"10.22363/2313-2264-2018-16-1-63-90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the rhetorical structures with the contrast semantics and their functions in the blog text, special attention is paid to the contrast relations at the nexus of the blogger’s message and the readers’ reactive commentaries, connection of these relations with the further text deployment. The rhetorical contrast relations are interpreted in the article as the pragmatic format of expressing the incompatibility between the interlocutors’ rational settings while having the same emotional and volitional state. Within the frameworks of the blog text we reveal the rhetorical contrast relation model which includes the justification of the contrast appropriateness from commenting readers. The problematic state of affairs representation as the stimulus presupposes the reactive explanation of the state of affairs resolution ways. The rhetorical contrast relations within the frameworks of the blogger’s stimulus and the reader’s reactive commentary predetermine the coherence of jointly generated virtual text which is marked by the adversative conjunction but or be the communicative context itself. The contrast and its reasoning coordinate the blogger and reader’s modus spheres with the obvious differences in their views upon the state of affairs under discussion. It is demonstrated that in the blog text the rhetorical contrast relations are associated consistently with the expressing of incompatible points of view shared by the interlocutors. In this case the adversative conjunction but pragmatic function is to to correlate the views expressed in the asynchronous time plane and, consequently, to contribute to the linear unfolding of jointly generated text. The functional importance of the adversative conjunction but is specified in the interactive aspect. It is illustrated that this kind of conjunction functions as a kind of signal that the reader realizing the reactive review undertakes the obligation of maintaining the joint design of the contrasting ideas embodied in the blog text.","PeriodicalId":140424,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Russian and Foreign Languages Research and Teaching","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Russian and Foreign Languages Research and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2264-2018-16-1-63-90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article analyzes the rhetorical structures with the contrast semantics and their functions in the blog text, special attention is paid to the contrast relations at the nexus of the blogger’s message and the readers’ reactive commentaries, connection of these relations with the further text deployment. The rhetorical contrast relations are interpreted in the article as the pragmatic format of expressing the incompatibility between the interlocutors’ rational settings while having the same emotional and volitional state. Within the frameworks of the blog text we reveal the rhetorical contrast relation model which includes the justification of the contrast appropriateness from commenting readers. The problematic state of affairs representation as the stimulus presupposes the reactive explanation of the state of affairs resolution ways. The rhetorical contrast relations within the frameworks of the blogger’s stimulus and the reader’s reactive commentary predetermine the coherence of jointly generated virtual text which is marked by the adversative conjunction but or be the communicative context itself. The contrast and its reasoning coordinate the blogger and reader’s modus spheres with the obvious differences in their views upon the state of affairs under discussion. It is demonstrated that in the blog text the rhetorical contrast relations are associated consistently with the expressing of incompatible points of view shared by the interlocutors. In this case the adversative conjunction but pragmatic function is to to correlate the views expressed in the asynchronous time plane and, consequently, to contribute to the linear unfolding of jointly generated text. The functional importance of the adversative conjunction but is specified in the interactive aspect. It is illustrated that this kind of conjunction functions as a kind of signal that the reader realizing the reactive review undertakes the obligation of maintaining the joint design of the contrasting ideas embodied in the blog text.
博客语篇对比的修辞关系:标记手段、语义、功能
本文分析了博客语篇中具有对比语义的修辞结构及其功能,重点分析了博主信息与读者反应性评论之间的对比关系,以及这些关系与后续语篇展开之间的联系。本文将修辞对比关系解释为在具有相同情感和意志状态的情况下,表达对话者理性设置之间不相容的语用形式。在博客文本的框架内,我们揭示了修辞对比关系模型,其中包括评论读者对对比适当性的论证。作为刺激的问题状态表征预设了对状态解决方式的反应性解释。在博主的刺激和读者的反应性评论框架内的修辞对比关系预先决定了共同生成的虚拟文本的连贯性,该虚拟文本以对偶连词为标志,但也可能是交际语境本身。这种对比及其推理协调了博主和读者的思维范围,使他们对所讨论的事态的看法明显不同。研究表明,在博客语篇中,修辞对比关系与对话者表达不相容的观点是一致的。在这种情况下,对抗性连词的语用功能是将异步时间平面上表达的观点联系起来,从而促进共同生成的文本的线性展开。相反连词的功能重要性在互动方面得到了具体说明。这种连接作为一种信号,表明实现反应性评论的读者承担了保持博客文本中所体现的对比思想的连接设计的义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信