Cognitive Stimulation Program Presented Through New Technologies in a Group of People with Moderate Cognitive Impairment.

Jesús González-Moreno, E. Satorres, G. Soria-Urios, J. Mélendez
{"title":"Cognitive Stimulation Program Presented Through New Technologies in a Group of People with Moderate Cognitive Impairment.","authors":"Jesús González-Moreno, E. Satorres, G. Soria-Urios, J. Mélendez","doi":"10.3233/jad-220245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nCognitive stimulation is one of the non-pharmacological therapies recommended for intervention in dementia, consisting of activities involving different cognitive domains and involving brain activation. New technologies can be very useful in this field, favoring intervention tasks.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nThe objective of this work is to test the effectiveness of a cognitive stimulation intervention mediated with new technologies on a group of people with moderate dementia.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis is a quantitative, quasi-experimental study with a control and treatment group, with three measurement times (pre, post, and follow-up months after the end of the intervention). Ninety-eight subjects with moderate dementia were randomly assigned to the treatment group (N = 50) and the control group (N = 48). The treatment group received 16 intervention sessions including attention, executive function, and memory tasks, which were presented using new technologies and the activity was conducted in a group setting. Control group remained on a waiting list. The evaluators did not know which group each subject belonged to. All participants were assessed with a battery of neuropsychological tests.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe results show an improvement in post-intervention outcomes in the treatment group compared to the control group on cognitive variables. No differences were found in mood depression. These results fade overtime after a few months without intervention.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis type of intervention is useful to maintain cognitive functioning using new technologies and in a group setting, which favors the intervention. The improvements of the intervention disappear at follow-up, which would indicate the need to maintain the intervention over time.","PeriodicalId":219895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-220245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND Cognitive stimulation is one of the non-pharmacological therapies recommended for intervention in dementia, consisting of activities involving different cognitive domains and involving brain activation. New technologies can be very useful in this field, favoring intervention tasks. OBJECTIVE The objective of this work is to test the effectiveness of a cognitive stimulation intervention mediated with new technologies on a group of people with moderate dementia. METHODS This is a quantitative, quasi-experimental study with a control and treatment group, with three measurement times (pre, post, and follow-up months after the end of the intervention). Ninety-eight subjects with moderate dementia were randomly assigned to the treatment group (N = 50) and the control group (N = 48). The treatment group received 16 intervention sessions including attention, executive function, and memory tasks, which were presented using new technologies and the activity was conducted in a group setting. Control group remained on a waiting list. The evaluators did not know which group each subject belonged to. All participants were assessed with a battery of neuropsychological tests. RESULTS The results show an improvement in post-intervention outcomes in the treatment group compared to the control group on cognitive variables. No differences were found in mood depression. These results fade overtime after a few months without intervention. CONCLUSION This type of intervention is useful to maintain cognitive functioning using new technologies and in a group setting, which favors the intervention. The improvements of the intervention disappear at follow-up, which would indicate the need to maintain the intervention over time.
通过新技术在中度认知障碍人群中的认知刺激方案。
认知刺激是推荐用于干预痴呆的非药物治疗方法之一,包括涉及不同认知域和涉及大脑激活的活动。新技术在这一领域非常有用,有利于干预任务。目的:研究新技术介导的认知刺激干预对中度痴呆患者的治疗效果。方法本研究为定量准实验研究,分为对照组和实验组,测量时间为3个月(干预前、干预后和干预结束后随访)。98例中度痴呆患者随机分为治疗组(N = 50)和对照组(N = 48)。治疗组接受了16次干预,包括注意力、执行功能和记忆任务,这些任务使用新技术进行,并在小组环境中进行。对照组仍在等待名单上。评估者并不知道每个受试者属于哪一组。所有参与者都接受了一系列神经心理学测试。结果治疗组在认知变量上的干预后结局较对照组有明显改善。在情绪抑郁方面没有发现差异。这些结果在没有干预的几个月后逐渐消失。结论采用新技术和群体干预有助于维持认知功能,有利于干预。干预措施的改善在随访中消失,这表明需要长期维持干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信