MODEL INTEGRATING SOCIETY, SCIENCE, ENVIRONMENT, TECHNOLOGY AND COLLABORATIVE MIND MAPPING MEMPENGARUHI PENALARAN MATEMATIS DAN MULTIPLE INTELLEGENCES

M. Mujib, M. Mardiyah, S. Suherman
{"title":"MODEL INTEGRATING SOCIETY, SCIENCE, ENVIRONMENT, TECHNOLOGY AND COLLABORATIVE MIND MAPPING MEMPENGARUHI PENALARAN MATEMATIS DAN MULTIPLE INTELLEGENCES","authors":"M. Mujib, M. Mardiyah, S. Suherman","doi":"10.23960/mtk/v10i1.pp70-82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reasoning is critical in all fields, but especially in mathematics. The purpose of this study is to ascertain the differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities when they are exposed to learning that integrates society, science, the environment, technology, and collaborative mind mapping (ISSETCM2). This is a quasi-experiment with a population of 220 students and a sample size of 60 students. The sampling technique used is simple random sampling without replacement (without replacement). Mathematical reasoning tests based on essays and questionnaires assessing multiple intelligences. Validity, reliability, normality, homogeneity, and two-way ANOVA were used to analyze the data. The results indicated that while students' mathematical reasoning abilities improved when ISSETCM2 learning was used, there was no difference in students' mathematical reasoning abilities when conventional learning was used. Furthermore, there was no difference in students' mathematical reasoning abilities when multiple intelligences were classified as high, medium, or low. There is no interaction between learning methods and students' mathematical reasoning abilities at the high, medium, or low multiple intelligence levels.","PeriodicalId":440747,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Lampung","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Lampung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23960/mtk/v10i1.pp70-82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reasoning is critical in all fields, but especially in mathematics. The purpose of this study is to ascertain the differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities when they are exposed to learning that integrates society, science, the environment, technology, and collaborative mind mapping (ISSETCM2). This is a quasi-experiment with a population of 220 students and a sample size of 60 students. The sampling technique used is simple random sampling without replacement (without replacement). Mathematical reasoning tests based on essays and questionnaires assessing multiple intelligences. Validity, reliability, normality, homogeneity, and two-way ANOVA were used to analyze the data. The results indicated that while students' mathematical reasoning abilities improved when ISSETCM2 learning was used, there was no difference in students' mathematical reasoning abilities when conventional learning was used. Furthermore, there was no difference in students' mathematical reasoning abilities when multiple intelligences were classified as high, medium, or low. There is no interaction between learning methods and students' mathematical reasoning abilities at the high, medium, or low multiple intelligence levels.
集成社会、科学、环境、技术和协同思维导图的模型
推理在所有领域都是至关重要的,尤其是在数学领域。本研究的目的是确定学生在接触整合了社会、科学、环境、技术和协作思维导图(ISSETCM2)的学习时数学推理能力的差异。这是一个准实验,有220名学生,60名学生。使用的抽样技术是简单的随机抽样,不更换(不更换)。基于论文和评估多元智能问卷的数学推理测试。采用效度、信度、正态性、均匀性和双因素方差分析对数据进行分析。结果表明,采用ISSETCM2学习方式提高了学生的数学推理能力,而采用常规学习方式对学生的数学推理能力无显著影响。此外,当多元智能被划分为高、中、低时,学生的数学推理能力没有差异。在高、中、低多元智力水平下,学习方法与学生的数学推理能力之间没有相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信