Theory and practice of multi-level foreign policy

Sibylle Bauer, E. Remacle
{"title":"Theory and practice of multi-level foreign policy","authors":"Sibylle Bauer, E. Remacle","doi":"10.7765/9781526137647.00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"processes. They cannot therefore be considered as general theories but rather as ideological models which reflect the state of the European construction, state the preferences and values of the actors in EU policy-making, and contribute to the inevitable compromises between them (Caporaso and Keeler 1995). From a constructivist perspective (Adler 1997b), one could say that integration theories are social and ideological constructs that contribute to shaping the reality of integration rather than to explaining it. European foreign policy is a case in point. Each area of foreign policy decisionmaking in the EU seems to be inspired by different ideological approaches to integration favoured by the different foreign policy actors. Accordingly, European foreign policy functions as a ‘system’ (Monar 1997) of multi-level policies structured in four levels, each of which refers indirectly to one of the main integration theories (Remacle 1997). This approach will be applied in this chapter to the field of arms export policies. Conflicting intergovernmentalism results from a perception of national policies as being the core of, and key to, explaining European policy-making. It is mainly inspired by the realist paradigm. Fundamental to this approach are the traditional application of the concept of sovereignty and the inter-state balance of power (Hill 1983; Pijpers 1991). The management of the Yugoslav crisis by EU countries best illustrates this aspect of EU foreign policy, as do national arms exports policies. Cooperative intergovernmentalism corresponds to theories of functionalism (Mitrany 1966), of adaptation (Rosenau 1970; Petersen 1998) and of maximisation of the national interest and/or convergence of preferences (Milward 1992; Moravcsik 1993; Pfetsch 1994). Illustrations of this type of European foreign policy are reflected in various forms of ad hoc biand multilateral cooperation between EU member states in the field of foreign policy. These include: reference Sibylle Bauer and Eric Remacle","PeriodicalId":301649,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking European Union Foreign Policy","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking European Union Foreign Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137647.00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

processes. They cannot therefore be considered as general theories but rather as ideological models which reflect the state of the European construction, state the preferences and values of the actors in EU policy-making, and contribute to the inevitable compromises between them (Caporaso and Keeler 1995). From a constructivist perspective (Adler 1997b), one could say that integration theories are social and ideological constructs that contribute to shaping the reality of integration rather than to explaining it. European foreign policy is a case in point. Each area of foreign policy decisionmaking in the EU seems to be inspired by different ideological approaches to integration favoured by the different foreign policy actors. Accordingly, European foreign policy functions as a ‘system’ (Monar 1997) of multi-level policies structured in four levels, each of which refers indirectly to one of the main integration theories (Remacle 1997). This approach will be applied in this chapter to the field of arms export policies. Conflicting intergovernmentalism results from a perception of national policies as being the core of, and key to, explaining European policy-making. It is mainly inspired by the realist paradigm. Fundamental to this approach are the traditional application of the concept of sovereignty and the inter-state balance of power (Hill 1983; Pijpers 1991). The management of the Yugoslav crisis by EU countries best illustrates this aspect of EU foreign policy, as do national arms exports policies. Cooperative intergovernmentalism corresponds to theories of functionalism (Mitrany 1966), of adaptation (Rosenau 1970; Petersen 1998) and of maximisation of the national interest and/or convergence of preferences (Milward 1992; Moravcsik 1993; Pfetsch 1994). Illustrations of this type of European foreign policy are reflected in various forms of ad hoc biand multilateral cooperation between EU member states in the field of foreign policy. These include: reference Sibylle Bauer and Eric Remacle
多层次外交政策的理论与实践
流程。因此,它们不能被视为一般理论,而是反映欧洲建设状况的意识形态模型,说明了欧盟决策参与者的偏好和价值观,并促成了他们之间不可避免的妥协(Caporaso和Keeler 1995)。从建构主义的角度来看(Adler 1997b),人们可以说整合理论是社会和意识形态的建构,有助于塑造整合的现实,而不是解释它。欧洲的外交政策就是一个很好的例子。欧盟外交政策决策的每个领域似乎都受到不同外交政策参与者所青睐的不同一体化意识形态方法的启发。因此,欧洲外交政策作为一个“系统”(Monar 1997),由四个层次构成的多层次政策组成,每一个层次都间接涉及一个主要的一体化理论(Remacle 1997)。这一方法将在本章中适用于武器出口政策领域。政府间主义的冲突源于一种看法,即国家政策是解释欧洲政策制定的核心和关键。它主要受到现实主义范式的启发。这种方法的基础是主权概念和国家间权力平衡的传统应用(Hill 1983;Pijpers 1991)。欧盟国家对南斯拉夫危机的处理最好地说明了欧盟外交政策的这一方面,各国的武器出口政策也是如此。合作政府间主义与功能主义理论(Mitrany 1966)、适应理论(Rosenau 1970;Petersen 1998)以及国家利益最大化和/或偏好趋同(Milward 1992;一些1993;Pfetsch 1994)。这种类型的欧洲外交政策体现在欧盟成员国在外交政策领域的各种形式的临时双边和多边合作中。其中包括:参考Sibylle Bauer和Eric Remacle
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信