Assessment in higher education: fields of issues

Grażyna Szyling
{"title":"Assessment in higher education: fields of issues","authors":"Grażyna Szyling","doi":"10.38014/ehs-ss.2021.4.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The axis of this analysis is designated by the situation of university assessment dangling between established practices and changes relating to integration of the European Higher Education Area, particularly the strategy of Lifewide Lifelong Learning. The yardstick for the analyses – methodologically embedded in critical hermeneutics – is pedagogical theory. In the picture of university assessment arising from reflections there dominates the logic of educational technology giving precedence to the systems functions of summative assessment over the formative one, with the latter being subjected to individual needs of learners.","PeriodicalId":261606,"journal":{"name":"EUROPEAN HUMANITIES STUDIES: State and Society","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUROPEAN HUMANITIES STUDIES: State and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38014/ehs-ss.2021.4.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The axis of this analysis is designated by the situation of university assessment dangling between established practices and changes relating to integration of the European Higher Education Area, particularly the strategy of Lifewide Lifelong Learning. The yardstick for the analyses – methodologically embedded in critical hermeneutics – is pedagogical theory. In the picture of university assessment arising from reflections there dominates the logic of educational technology giving precedence to the systems functions of summative assessment over the formative one, with the latter being subjected to individual needs of learners.
高等教育评估:问题领域
这一分析的轴心是由大学评估的情况确定的,这些评估在既成的实践和与欧洲高等教育区一体化有关的变化之间摇摆不定,特别是终身学习的战略。分析的尺度——方法上嵌入批判解释学——是教学理论。在反思产生的大学评估图景中,教育技术的逻辑占据主导地位,总结性评估的系统功能优先于形成性评估,后者受制于学习者的个人需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信