Examining the Records

Thomas Graumann
{"title":"Examining the Records","authors":"Thomas Graumann","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198868170.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A synodical trial conducted in Constantinople in AD 448 against the archimandrite Eutyches produced protocols of eight sessions. Challenged by the condemned Eutyches for their alleged manipulation, two imperial commissions investigated these records and tested their reliability and veracity. The chapter analyses the inquiries’ investigation into the different types of documents coming before them and the resultant discussions between secretaries, bishops, and officials about the crucial relationship between ‘originals’ and ‘copies’ of such records and their respective standing and proper use in a legal altercation. The technical vocabulary used in these discussions for such documents is analysed. The disputes further show by what visual features the status of documents could be identified and evaluated. They allow inferences as to the production process and the keeping and storage of records.","PeriodicalId":137869,"journal":{"name":"The Acts of the Early Church Councils","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Acts of the Early Church Councils","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198868170.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A synodical trial conducted in Constantinople in AD 448 against the archimandrite Eutyches produced protocols of eight sessions. Challenged by the condemned Eutyches for their alleged manipulation, two imperial commissions investigated these records and tested their reliability and veracity. The chapter analyses the inquiries’ investigation into the different types of documents coming before them and the resultant discussions between secretaries, bishops, and officials about the crucial relationship between ‘originals’ and ‘copies’ of such records and their respective standing and proper use in a legal altercation. The technical vocabulary used in these discussions for such documents is analysed. The disputes further show by what visual features the status of documents could be identified and evaluated. They allow inferences as to the production process and the keeping and storage of records.
查阅纪录
公元448年在君士坦丁堡进行的一项针对大主教欧提奇的宗教审判产生了8次会议的协议。被判死刑的尤提奇对他们所谓的操纵提出质疑,两个帝国委员会调查了这些记录,并测试了它们的可靠性和真实性。这一章分析了对不同类型文件的调查,以及秘书、主教和官员之间关于这些记录的“原件”和“副本”之间的关键关系以及它们各自的地位和在法律纠纷中的正确使用的讨论。分析了这些讨论中对此类文件使用的技术词汇。这些争议进一步表明,通过哪些视觉特征可以识别和评价文件的地位。它们允许对生产过程和记录的保存和存储进行推断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信