Securitization Model and Referenda-2014 in Scotland and Catalonia

V. Apryshchenko
{"title":"Securitization Model and Referenda-2014 in Scotland and Catalonia","authors":"V. Apryshchenko","doi":"10.15535/272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with role of historical memory in the context of two referenda which have been held in 2014 — in Scotland on the18th of September and in Catalonia on the 9th of November, although not recognised by the Spanish government. Both of themreflect the issue of how the imperial past influences current political debates about independence. In spite of the different politicaland cultural contexts, the two referenda have been deeply connected with history and memory and have exploited imperial settingsto explain the ‘security choice’. This article argues that traumatic experience of transition between the imperial and national contextshas been the decisive factor in the process of securitization of memory. Although memory has been considered as a strategicrecourse in the two regions, the way it has been utilized is different. The memory of the past was shifted from the sphere of politicsto the sphere of security, and memory has been utilized as a means of securitization. Desecuritization of the national memory in theScottish and the Catalan contexts is connected with its politicization as well as with placing it within the cultural context. Britishand Spanish imperial pasts have been sublimated in the form of cultural symbols and memories.","PeriodicalId":375014,"journal":{"name":"Russian Academic Journal","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Academic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15535/272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with role of historical memory in the context of two referenda which have been held in 2014 — in Scotland on the18th of September and in Catalonia on the 9th of November, although not recognised by the Spanish government. Both of themreflect the issue of how the imperial past influences current political debates about independence. In spite of the different politicaland cultural contexts, the two referenda have been deeply connected with history and memory and have exploited imperial settingsto explain the ‘security choice’. This article argues that traumatic experience of transition between the imperial and national contextshas been the decisive factor in the process of securitization of memory. Although memory has been considered as a strategicrecourse in the two regions, the way it has been utilized is different. The memory of the past was shifted from the sphere of politicsto the sphere of security, and memory has been utilized as a means of securitization. Desecuritization of the national memory in theScottish and the Catalan contexts is connected with its politicization as well as with placing it within the cultural context. Britishand Spanish imperial pasts have been sublimated in the form of cultural symbols and memories.
证券化模式和公投-2014在苏格兰和加泰罗尼亚
这篇文章讨论了2014年举行的两次公投中历史记忆的作用——9月18日在苏格兰举行,11月9日在加泰罗尼亚举行,尽管西班牙政府没有承认。它们都反映了帝国的过去如何影响当前关于独立的政治辩论。尽管政治和文化背景不同,但两次公投都与历史和记忆有着深刻的联系,并利用帝国背景来解释“安全选择”。本文认为,帝国语境与民族语境转换的创伤性经验是记忆证券化过程中的决定性因素。尽管记忆在这两个地区被认为是一种战略资源,但利用它的方式是不同的。对过去的记忆从政治领域转移到安全领域,记忆被用作证券化的手段。在苏格兰和加泰罗尼亚语境中,民族记忆的非安全化与其政治化以及将其置于文化语境中有关。英国和西班牙帝国的过去以文化符号和记忆的形式得到升华。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信