A pragmatic method for estimating greenhouse gas emissions from leakage for Improved Forest Management projects under the Verified Carbon Standard

S. Sharma, M. Telfer, Samuel T.G. Phua, Helen C Chandler
{"title":"A pragmatic method for estimating greenhouse gas emissions from leakage for Improved Forest Management projects under the Verified Carbon Standard","authors":"S. Sharma, M. Telfer, Samuel T.G. Phua, Helen C Chandler","doi":"10.1080/20430779.2012.696237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS), adjustments must be made for leakage when calculating the net greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions for an Improved Forest Management (IFM) project. Leakage can be distinguished as either activity shifting leakage or market leakage, based on the agent doing the shifting, and the forest location where the timber harvesting occurs. The current VCS method of applying default market leakage discount factors to determine market leakage can significantly affect the feasibility of IFM projects. In addition, the VCS requirement to demonstrate ‘no leakage’ for activity shifting leakage may also jeopardize a project's viability. An empirical ex post method for accounting for leakage of an IFM project has been proposed in this article. Annual timber harvesting data gathered during the historical reference period and the monitoring period of an IFM project is applied and tested in case studies under various timber harvesting scenarios. The recommended method for activity shifting requires regular monitoring of all potential leakage areas comprising forestlands existing or newly acquired by the IFM Project Proponent. Quantification of market leakage using directly measured data from a national database reduces both the risk and the uncertainty of market leakage attributed to an IFM project.","PeriodicalId":411329,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20430779.2012.696237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Under the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS), adjustments must be made for leakage when calculating the net greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions for an Improved Forest Management (IFM) project. Leakage can be distinguished as either activity shifting leakage or market leakage, based on the agent doing the shifting, and the forest location where the timber harvesting occurs. The current VCS method of applying default market leakage discount factors to determine market leakage can significantly affect the feasibility of IFM projects. In addition, the VCS requirement to demonstrate ‘no leakage’ for activity shifting leakage may also jeopardize a project's viability. An empirical ex post method for accounting for leakage of an IFM project has been proposed in this article. Annual timber harvesting data gathered during the historical reference period and the monitoring period of an IFM project is applied and tested in case studies under various timber harvesting scenarios. The recommended method for activity shifting requires regular monitoring of all potential leakage areas comprising forestlands existing or newly acquired by the IFM Project Proponent. Quantification of market leakage using directly measured data from a national database reduces both the risk and the uncertainty of market leakage attributed to an IFM project.
验证碳标准下改善森林管理项目渗漏温室气体排放估算的实用方法
根据核证碳标准(VCS),在计算改善森林管理(IFM)项目的温室气体(GHG)净减排量时,必须对泄漏进行调整。根据进行转移的主体和发生木材采伐的森林位置,泄漏可以区分为活动转移泄漏或市场泄漏。目前VCS采用违约市场泄漏贴现因子来确定市场泄漏的方法会显著影响IFM项目的可行性。此外,VCS对活动转移泄漏的“无泄漏”要求也可能危及项目的可行性。本文提出了一种核算IFM项目渗漏的实证事后方法。在IFM项目的历史参考期间和监测期间收集的年度木材采伐数据在各种木材采伐情景的案例研究中得到应用和检验。建议的活动转移方法需要定期监测所有潜在的泄漏区域,包括IFM项目倡议者现有或新获得的林地。使用来自国家数据库的直接测量数据对市场泄漏进行量化,可以降低由IFM项目导致的市场泄漏的风险和不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信