Traditional religiosity in the socio-cultural continuum of the borderline (1920‒1930s)

A. Kyrydon
{"title":"Traditional religiosity in the socio-cultural continuum of the borderline (1920‒1930s)","authors":"A. Kyrydon","doi":"10.33294/2523-4234-2023-33-1-73-100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the priority directions of research of domestic historians of the period of independence of Ukraine, the problems of the history of the Church and the clergy. One of the turning points in the history of society and the state was the period of the 1920s and 1930s, when a special form of secular processes inherent in the Soviet totalitarian system and the artificial liberation (mostly under the pressure of the state) of social life from the influence of religion determined the church and religious situation of the specified and and subsequent periods. The study of the transformation of religiosity in such turning points objectifies the transmission of the religious tradition or highlights gaps in continuity, contributes to the understanding of experience, mental structures of consciousness, the construction of religious and social identity, etc.\nThe transformational breaks characteristic of transitional periods (in particular, the 1920s and 1930s) are manifested quite clearly in not one of the segments, but, as a rule, cover all components of the sociocultural life space, creating at the same time a situation of instability and uncertainty, generating a crisis of identities, strengthening differentiation society, etc. Under these conditions, the processes of finding new forms of socio-cultural organization, norms, rules, meaning of being, cultural paradigm, building a new hierarchy of values and identities are intensified.\nA retrospective study of traditional religiosity in the socio-cultural continuum processes of the borderline period of the 1920‒1930s is present, first of all, in its importance for a holistic systematic, scientific study of the problems of state-church relations, church history, worldview transformation, etc., and the need for expansion problematic research field. The establishment of the Bolshevik political regime in Ukraine and the socio-economic modernization processes caused not only radical socio-political and socio-economic changes, but also followed the establishment of a new socio-cultural reality, the formation of a new system of value orientations, etc. Religiosity is not constant – it changes depending on the socio-cultural determinants of a particular society, which is transformed. Objectively, the dynamics of religiosity are influenced by socio-economic, political-ideological, demographic, cultural, environmental, household and other factors.\nIn transitional period of the 1920s and 1930s, on the one hand, we observe persistent religiosity, supported by part of the rural population, on the other hand, the formation of supporters of a new ideological system and a new socialist ritual, the construction of the “Own/Stranger” watershed (marginalization of the clergy), the establishment of a new non-religious way of life, support and participation in the anti-religious campaigns of the Soviet government, aimed, first of all, against the old system of values, age-old traditions, religious consciousness, etc.\nKeywords: religiosity, tradition, Church, borderline, Ukrainian peasantry, Soviet state","PeriodicalId":302536,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Yearbook \"History of Religions in Ukraine\"","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Yearbook \"History of Religions in Ukraine\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33294/2523-4234-2023-33-1-73-100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among the priority directions of research of domestic historians of the period of independence of Ukraine, the problems of the history of the Church and the clergy. One of the turning points in the history of society and the state was the period of the 1920s and 1930s, when a special form of secular processes inherent in the Soviet totalitarian system and the artificial liberation (mostly under the pressure of the state) of social life from the influence of religion determined the church and religious situation of the specified and and subsequent periods. The study of the transformation of religiosity in such turning points objectifies the transmission of the religious tradition or highlights gaps in continuity, contributes to the understanding of experience, mental structures of consciousness, the construction of religious and social identity, etc. The transformational breaks characteristic of transitional periods (in particular, the 1920s and 1930s) are manifested quite clearly in not one of the segments, but, as a rule, cover all components of the sociocultural life space, creating at the same time a situation of instability and uncertainty, generating a crisis of identities, strengthening differentiation society, etc. Under these conditions, the processes of finding new forms of socio-cultural organization, norms, rules, meaning of being, cultural paradigm, building a new hierarchy of values and identities are intensified. A retrospective study of traditional religiosity in the socio-cultural continuum processes of the borderline period of the 1920‒1930s is present, first of all, in its importance for a holistic systematic, scientific study of the problems of state-church relations, church history, worldview transformation, etc., and the need for expansion problematic research field. The establishment of the Bolshevik political regime in Ukraine and the socio-economic modernization processes caused not only radical socio-political and socio-economic changes, but also followed the establishment of a new socio-cultural reality, the formation of a new system of value orientations, etc. Religiosity is not constant – it changes depending on the socio-cultural determinants of a particular society, which is transformed. Objectively, the dynamics of religiosity are influenced by socio-economic, political-ideological, demographic, cultural, environmental, household and other factors. In transitional period of the 1920s and 1930s, on the one hand, we observe persistent religiosity, supported by part of the rural population, on the other hand, the formation of supporters of a new ideological system and a new socialist ritual, the construction of the “Own/Stranger” watershed (marginalization of the clergy), the establishment of a new non-religious way of life, support and participation in the anti-religious campaigns of the Soviet government, aimed, first of all, against the old system of values, age-old traditions, religious consciousness, etc. Keywords: religiosity, tradition, Church, borderline, Ukrainian peasantry, Soviet state
边缘社会文化连续体中的传统宗教信仰(1920 - 1930)
在乌克兰独立时期国内历史学家研究的优先方向中,教会和神职人员的历史问题。社会和国家历史上的一个转折点是20世纪20年代和30年代,当时苏联极权主义制度固有的一种特殊形式的世俗过程,以及人为地(主要在国家的压力下)从宗教的影响中解放社会生活,决定了特定时期和随后时期的教会和宗教状况。对这些转折点中宗教信仰转变的研究使宗教传统的传播客观化,或突出了连续性中的差距,有助于理解经验、意识的心理结构、宗教和社会身份的构建等。过渡时期(特别是20世纪20年代和30年代)的转变中断特征在其中一个片段中表现得非常清楚,但作为一种规则,覆盖社会文化生活空间的所有组成部分,同时造成不稳定和不确定的局面,产生身份危机,加强分化社会等。在这些条件下,寻找社会文化组织的新形式、规范、规则、存在的意义、文化范式、建立新的价值和身份等级的过程得到加强。回顾20世纪20 - 30年代边缘时期社会文化连续过程中的传统宗教性,首先在于它对于全面系统、科学地研究政教关系、教会历史、世界观转变等问题具有重要意义,并有拓展问题研究领域的必要性。乌克兰布尔什维克政权的建立和社会经济现代化进程不仅引起了激进的社会政治和社会经济变革,而且伴随着新的社会文化现实的确立,新的价值取向体系的形成等。宗教信仰并不是一成不变的,它的变化取决于特定社会的社会文化决定因素。客观上,宗教信仰的动态受到社会经济、政治意识形态、人口、文化、环境、家庭和其他因素的影响。在20世纪二三十年代的过渡时期,一方面,我们看到了部分农村人口支持的顽固的宗教信仰,另一方面,形成了新的思想体系和新的社会主义仪式的支持者,“自己/陌生人”分水岭的构建(神职人员的边缘化),一种新的非宗教生活方式的建立,支持和参与了苏维埃政府的反宗教运动,其目的首先是:反对旧的价值体系、古老的传统、宗教意识等。关键词:宗教性、传统、教会、边界线、乌克兰农民、苏维埃国家
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信